Baleforce
Mark Falco
I walked past the protest location at 2.10pm (think it was due to start at 1.30pm). I stopped and counted 16 people (no banners).
and fewer brain cells
they are an embarrassment to the fan base
I walked past the protest location at 2.10pm (think it was due to start at 1.30pm). I stopped and counted 16 people (no banners).
£7.99How much was it?
That takes the biscuit.Seen a banner saying "killed a club" walking to the ground.
Behave lads
ENIC I doubt will be acknowledging let alone combatting
Agree and why should they, its just a few idiots waving banners about and being laughed at the the vast majority of fans.
and fewer brain cells
they are an embarrassment to the fan base
As are some of the fans who blindly go along with everything the club do and dare never question anything.
Some are just more interested in transfers than the game itself I have found. I was buzzing about Richy performance yesterday, got home and then logged in (my fault totally) only to see people getting upset about Eze
Ironically the same fans whos rationale for the protest was "it will force deals"
If we do sign Eze, the sugar hit will last about 3 hours before it moves on to the next transfer.
I’ve not seen any of those, seem like straw men to to me.
You may have though, so fair enough.
Saw plenty defend the decision to try and join the super league, put staff on furlough during Covid and when we made no signings for 3 consecutive windows. The farcical managerial search in 2021 that led to us appointing Nuno who was about 12th choice.
Saw plenty defend the decision to try and join the super league, put staff on furlough during Covid and when we made no signings for 3 consecutive windows. The farcical managerial search in 2021 that led to us appointing Nuno who was about 12th choice.
Because we were still paying players because they wouldn’t go on furloughI still don't understand why it was wrong to put staff on furlough
It will be “but we didn’t get Savinho” so we failed againIf we do sign Eze, the sugar hit will last about 3 hours before it moves on to the next transfer.
That’s only 4 things, from the thousands of decisions that have been made in that time.
Because we were still paying players because they wouldn’t go on furlough
I didn’t get the negatives either TBH
As a tax paying company why not
I still don't understand why it was wrong to put staff on furlough
And very rarely (if ever) do you see certain posters disagree with any decision they make.
IIRC we were one of the only PL clubs to do so. And then we had to embarrassingly reverse the decision after we got stick for it in the media.