• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

AVB Press Conference

Was I imagining it, or did Andre mention Les Ferdinand still being on the coaching staff? I think he did.
 
Ah ok fair enough. Sometimes it's better to just look at things from a simplistic viewpoint which luckily i did on this occasion (being on a football forum it's impossible to do it all the time tbh).

Simplistic viewpoint = Yep Brad did well last season and has 1 year left on his contract. Shown no signs of his age catching up on him so give him another year as first choice.

Over thinking viewpoint = Dear me brad will never fit into AVB's sweeper keeper system. It will never work and AVB will bring someone in.

You're going a bit over the top with your view that players don't need to be signed to fit into a manager's tactics. They clearly do.
 
Over thinking viewpoint = Dear me brad will never fit into AVB's sweeper keeper system. It will never work and AVB will bring someone in.

It's actually Rodgers who utilises the sweeper-keeper in his formation - don't think it's a must for AVB though
 
I thought it was pretty obvious.



Either we've not been bidding and something else has been going on.


Or Avb doesn't want to alienate the current keepers without something definite in place.

or after a few days training he has realised we have enough quality already at the club and the 13 mill that would be spent on Lloris can in fact be redirected to other areas of the squad that need strengthening
 
You're going a bit over the top with your view that players don't need to be signed to fit into a manager's tactics. They clearly do.

My point is that "Sweeper keeper" is not a tactic. Ok put it this way if we make no attempts to sign a genuine first choice GK this summer i assume you'd hold your hands up and say your statement just now is wrong right?
 
Ah ok fair enough. Sometimes it's better to just look at things from a simplistic viewpoint which luckily i did on this occasion (being on a football forum it's impossible to do it all the time tbh).

Simplistic viewpoint = Yep Brad did well last season and has 1 year left on his contract. Shown no signs of his age catching up on him so give him another year as first choice.

Over thinking viewpoint = Dear me brad will never fit into AVB's sweeper keeper system. It will never work and AVB will bring someone in.

Your simplistic viewpoint is just one of a number of possible simplistic viewpoints. There are multiple possible explanations for why Spurs might be interested in signing Lloris this summer.

And until we've heard the precise wording of both the question asked of AVB and the answer he gave, I wouldn't go putting money on Spurs not being in for Lloris quite yet.
 
My point is that "Sweeper keeper" is not a tactic. Ok put it this way if we make no attempts to sign a genuine first choice GK this summer i assume you'd hold your hands up and say your statement just now is wrong right?

Sweeper keeper is not a tactic - it's an attribute of a keeper who fits into a certain formation / gameplay - i.e. #9 focal point into a 4-5-1
 
or after a few days training he has realised we have enough quality already at the club and the 13 mill that would be spent on Lloris can in fact be redirected to other areas of the squad that need strengthening


Ah true, I did not think of that one. Good shout.
 
My point is that "Sweeper keeper" is not a tactic. Ok put it this way if we make no attempts to sign a genuine first choice GK this summer i assume you'd hold your hands up and say your statement just now is wrong right?


Sweeper keeper is as much a 'tactic' as a deep lying playmaker, a trequista or any of those other sub-positions.
 
Tottenham's new manager Andre Villas-Boas today spoke for the first time of his aborted reign at Chelsea, insisting failure there was not of his own doing, and of his own ambitions at White Hart Lane which include winning a first Premier League title.

Villas-Boas, the 34-year-old from Portugal who led Porto to their national title and the Europa League before joining Chelsea at the start of last season, was in combative mood at Spurs’ new state-of-the-art training ground near Enfield.

Villas-Boas insisted he had nothing to prove at Tottenham after being sacked by Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich four months ago.

He said: “I cannot assume that failure on my own. It was never a one person failure. I will never take it like that. There were mistakes I made, which I have learned from, but the decision to terminate the project was not mine, it was the decision of the owner of Chelsea.

“For Chelsea to have won the FA Cup and the Champions League means they were still present in those competitions by that time [when Villas-Boas departed]. It means Chelsea were ever present in those competitions and in the Premier League as well.

“The owner’s decision? I respect to the fullest but I never accepted it.

“I move on from that, I’m very honoured that I was able to put that team together. You can say that part of what they achieved is also down to that squad being put together by myself.

“What was done after I left is down to the work of Roberto di Matteo and the work of the magnificent players. They achieved it on their own. But it is never a one-man failure when you work with so many diverse things in a football club.”

Villas-Boas was struggling with a sore throat, perhaps the result of an atrocious English summer which continued this afternoon with heavy rain beating like a drum on the roof of the futuristic indoor training facility that Spurs players will enjoy when it opens next month.

Villas-Boas went on: “I’m not a mission to restore my reputation. It is a mission to put Tottenham back on track with titles.

“Since 2008 we haven’t won anything and I think it is right that we take the club forward. And taking the club forward is mixing it with titles and with success. Hopefully, I can bring those to this football club.”

That success will haver to be achieved without Liverpool and England striker Andy Carroll with Villas-Boas dismissing reports that he was interested in the player. He also denied being close to signing France No1 Hugo Lloris from Lyon. But he insisted Luka Modric was part of his plans although discussions over the midfielder’s future were in the hands of chairman Daniel Levy.

As for his ambitions with Spurs Villas-Boas said: “We have to continue with the quality Harry Redknapp left. That is very important. To lose what Harry left us with would be a mistake, so we have to build on that to put Tottenham on the road for titles.

“I think last year was the first year that we saw Tottenham so openly speak in public about the title, and that is where we want to go.

“I think we have to understand that Champions League football is a big importance for this club, we have to accept that that is our responsibility. But we want to assume further responsibility by going one step further and winning something for the club.”

http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/foo...hat-it-all-went-wrong-at-chelsea-7936043.html

Fair reporting from The Standard
 
Your simplistic viewpoint is just one of a number of possible simplistic viewpoints. There are multiple possible explanations for why Spurs might be interested in signing Lloris this summer.

And until we've heard the precise wording of both the question asked of AVB and the answer he gave, I wouldn't go putting money on Spurs not being in for Lloris quite yet.

i was thinking like you at first, but then i heard that he gave very honest answers about Adebayor, Modric, and Moutinho, so to dismiss Lloris as a potential signing seems quite strange if in fact we are very interested in him.

another possibility is that Lloris is proving to be too expensive and AVB has his eye on someone else like Butland who in fact was mentioned as one of his main targets when he first took the job
 
I just wonder, if he fancies giving Gomes a shot.

He can almost try to see if Gomes can regain form and fit into the 'sweeper keeper' thing everyone is going on about (yes, I know he looks scared of the ball!)

At least, he can try give it a go, and if not, then he's always got Brad to get us through this season.
 
Sweeper keeper is not a tactic - it's an attribute of a keeper who fits into a certain formation / gameplay - i.e. #9 focal point into a 4-5-1

Ok well i don't think it's that either. It's an attribute of a GK that likes to come off his line and distribute the ball quickly? yes ok i can accept that but i do not accept the part about it fitting into a certain formation/gameplay and then you comparing it to a lone striker in a 4-5-1. It's not even close to being half as important to that and i do not think a manager considers it as important as some of you are making out.

Anyway we'll see if AVB signs a GK.
 
As for his ambitions with Spurs Villas-Boas said: “We have to continue with the quality Harry Redknapp left. That is very important. To lose what Harry left us with would be a mistake, so we have to build on that to put Tottenham on the road for titles.

“I think last year was the first year that we saw Tottenham so openly speak in public about the title, and that is where we want to go.

“I think we have to understand that Champions League football is a big importance for this club, we have to accept that that is our responsibility. But we want to assume further responsibility by going one step further and winning something for the club.”


............

=D>
 
My point is that "Sweeper keeper" is not a tactic. Ok put it this way if we make no attempts to sign a genuine first choice GK this summer i assume you'd hold your hands up and say your statement just now is wrong right?

Yeah of course I would, no problems there.

It's not a tactic. It's a player type. Just like having an anchorman or a deep lying midfielder, etc etc. Would you be saying that a tactic that works with width doesn't need pacey wingers? Why is a goalkeeper position excempt from needing the right type of player?
 
i was thinking like you at first, but then i heard that he gave very honest answers about Adebayor, Modric, and Moutinho, so to dismiss Lloris as a potential signing seems quite strange if in fact we are very interested in him.

another possibility is that Lloris is proving to be too expensive and AVB has his eye on someone else like Butland who in fact was mentioned as one of his main targets when he first took the job

Could just be a case of negotiations for Lloris being far more sensitive / uncertain / in the balance than the negotiations for Adebayor and Moutinho.
 
Yeah of course I would, no problems there.

It's not a tactic. It's a player type. Just like having an anchorman or a deep lying midfielder, etc etc. Would you be saying that a tactic that works with width doesn't need pacey wingers? Why is a goalkeeper position excempt from needing the right type of player?


I tried that one. He said no. :-s
 
Back