glasgowspur
Paul Stewart
If we can keep him we will be building a statue of this guy in the future.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Archie Gray
- Thread starter mjc23
- Start date
WillWeEverBeGoodAgain
Johnny nice-tits
I absolutely love him, has been my fav player this season
Low bar I know but for his attitude on and off the pitch, his willingness to play anywhere for the team
The boy is a superstar
NaijaSpurs
Cecil Poynton
Our new manager said he has seen a lot of our recent matches. I hope however it means we will not longer see Gray play as a full back/wing back. He has a pivotal role to play in our future.
thfcsteff
Sonny Walters
I hate to say this, but if Romero is out for the season, and De Zerbi wants us to play out from the back, I think we might have to play Archie at CB if only to ensure we have some passing capability in our CBs. Danso is a better box-defender perhaps, but he is not a passer at all, thus we will just be going sideways all the time.
Archie at CB would at least allow us passing from that area, plus he has experience of the role.
We are going to have to get creative.
Side for Brighton???
Kinsky
Porro
Gray
Van De Ven
Udogie
Sarr
Bergvall
Spence
Xavi
Tel
Richy
Richy is not ideal as a lone striker but he offers me than Solanke right now who is bang out of form. Muani is not at it. Gallagher isn't either. Spence would at least offer some speed and presence wide. Xavi has to play. I might consider Palhinha over Bergy to start...
Archie at CB would at least allow us passing from that area, plus he has experience of the role.
We are going to have to get creative.
Side for Brighton???
Kinsky
Porro
Gray
Van De Ven
Udogie
Sarr
Bergvall
Spence
Xavi
Tel
Richy
Richy is not ideal as a lone striker but he offers me than Solanke right now who is bang out of form. Muani is not at it. Gallagher isn't either. Spence would at least offer some speed and presence wide. Xavi has to play. I might consider Palhinha over Bergy to start...
Bishop
Rafael Van Der Vaart
Likewise, he's a decent passer. I'd rather keep Gray in midfield tbh. Danso is a significantly better defender than him and Gray's passing doesn't compensate for what we lose defensively that it would be worth hampering two positions at the same time.
Last edited:
yiddo37
Sergei Rebrov
Would put Spence RB to shackle Mitoma as Porro is pretty naff defensively. Muani is such a strange player, looks to have decent ability but falls over when any contact is made.
Maybe stick Porro on the right of the 3 with Xavi and Tel centre and left as you have it.
Toss of a coin with Rich and Sokanke for CF.
Get the Brighton OMT up and running @thfcsteff
Bishop
Rafael Van Der Vaart
Spence at RB and Porro ahead of him is as good a try as anything. We do have a problem with the striker as none of Richy, Solanke or Muani seem quite right. None is the complete option or even the good enough option. I'm somewhat partial to Minibus a CF as I think his ceiling is higher than the other two but I won't pretend he's been good for us either.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
I'd go the other way round. Porro's asset is his deep diagonal crosses. Whereas Spence showed against Dortmund that he can be a genuine driving dribbler from a wing position.
ricky2tricky4city
Paul Stewart
I think which way round is dependent on if we have any intention that the deeper player is going to be doing any under lapping/overlapping.