• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Ange departs

Ange departs.

  • In

    Votes: 80 42.1%
  • Out

    Votes: 110 57.9%

  • Total voters
    190
Status
Not open for further replies.
I feel like we’ve done the hard yards. Stadium, training ground, CL and at least some form of European football more often than not. A squad with some top players. An actual trophy!

Now I want to win the league. I think my mistake was assuming that when the stadium was built we’d start acting like a club that wanted to win the league. Instead, it upped our wage bill but we still act like the same club relative to the others in the league. That’s when I realised it’s an ENIC thing.

I don’t consider it buying success anymore. I think the hard yards mean we can still say we’ve done it the right way. But we need to take a leap somehow. I don’t want to be a sports washing project ideally, but smart owners willing to take risks like Liverpool’s have done I would really like.

Fair enough.
 
I’m not sure why - there is nothing to the article (unless I can’t see it all…?). Basically a quick re-telling of the past week, with an unattributed claim thrown in.

It's complete tosh. Ange "privately felt" is an empty statement.

Ange should be annoyed at this article because if he didn't feel it then he shouldn't have taken our money. It questions his integrity. He obviously did feel it and definitely spoke like someone who was fired up to help us transition. Obviously, he came up short himself in a few areas but that doesn't mean he didn't walk into the role with the right attitude.
 
It's complete tosh. Ange "privately felt" is an empty statement.

Ange should be annoyed at this article because if he didn't feel it then he shouldn't have taken our money. It questions his integrity. He obviously did feel it and definitely spoke like someone who was fired up to help us transition. Obviously, he came up short himself in a few areas but that doesn't mean he didn't walk into the role with the right attitude.

Total BS article, and usual "find some vaguely defined Spurs problem that is unsurmountable for all" narrative.

Ange got 300M, his own training staff, and a level of patience that has never been given before. His failure is on him, zero doubt if he had finished 12th (still worse league result in 20 years), with the cup, he'd still have a job, would have money for another go at transforming club.
 
Total BS article, and usual "find some vaguely defined Spurs problem that is unsurmountable for all" narrative.

Ange got 300M, his own training staff, and a level of patience that has never been given before. His failure is on him, zero doubt if he had finished 12th (still worse league result in 20 years), with the cup, he'd still have a job, would have money for another go at transforming club.
I am/was Ange in, but how anyone can be shocked or tinkled off at the club that he was sacked is beyond me, frankly..
 
I am/was Ange in, but how anyone can be shocked or tinkled off at the club that he was sacked is beyond me, frankly..

And when he was inevitably fired 15 games into next season -> the clubs a fudging circus, why can't we find a manager (because we are trying to hire one mid season), then everyone would trot out the trend data over last two season to say "why was he kept on"
 
IMG_4038.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back