• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Richarlison

How about Havertz, Chelsea paid circa 100 million euros for him, Woolwich circa 75 million , all I read everywhere is that if you pay big money for players they are top class .

Well that’s just cherry picking the bad ones that cost lots of money. We should be looking for the next Isak or someone young/gettable. It’s not like it’s Richarlison, Haaland or nobody.
 
Well that’s just cherry picking the bad ones that cost lots of money. We should be looking for the next Isak or someone young/gettable. It’s not like it’s Richarlison, Haaland or nobody.
True but every top club in Europe is trying to do the same looking for top goalscorers it's not that simple just to go out and discover the next star player. It's not just Havertz who cost a lot of money there are plenty of other examples , Liverpool spent years trying to get in a top goalscorer, they tried Carroll, Benteke, Torres plus Robbie Keane and sent him back.
 
True but every top club in Europe is trying to do the same looking for top goalscorers it's not that simple just to go out and discover the next star player. It's not just Havertz who cost a lot of money there are plenty of other examples , Liverpool spent years trying to get in a top goalscorer, they tried Carroll, Benteke, Torres plus Robbie Keane and sent him back.
And the truth is, before your new signing starts playing, you can never really know for certain if he'll be a Havertz or an Isak - regardless of how much you've paid or how well the player has performed previously.
 
Back