• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

There are loads of different valuations of clubs by different sources , Forbes has us at £2.4 billion that's half the valuation of Manure but higher than Chelsea. The Qataris baulked at paying that price for Manure , which judging by what Ratcliffe paid is not far off their value.

All the middle east buyers of English clubs so far have paid nowhere near those figures, are owners like ENIC and others unrealistic in what they want for clubs?

 
There are loads of different valuations of clubs by different sources , Forbes has us at £2.4 billion that's half the valuation of Manure but higher than Chelsea. The Qataris baulked at paying that price for Manure , which judging by what Ratcliffe paid is not far off their value.

All the middle east buyers of English clubs so far have paid nowhere near those figures, are owners like ENIC and others unrealistic in what they want for clubs?

They aren’t to unrealistic as it’s their choice
It’s not like they need to sell
 
And that is entirely his prerogative, nothing, absolutely nothing says ENIC has to sell at "a fair price" (to your point)

Chelsea set a huge outlier in evaluation, 4B+ for a fire sale on a club with sketchy ground ownership and in bad need of infrastructure rebuild means Spurs can/should ask more
I think success of the team and it's stature would play a part as well. Chelsea are simply a much bigger name than we are on the international stage and much more successful at the end of the day. I can see someone being willing to pay more of a premium for that than Spurs imo.
 
There are loads of different valuations of clubs by different sources , Forbes has us at £2.4 billion that's half the valuation of Manure but higher than Chelsea. The Qataris baulked at paying that price for Manure , which judging by what Ratcliffe paid is not far off their value.

All the middle east buyers of English clubs so far have paid nowhere near those figures, are owners like ENIC and others unrealistic in what they want for clubs?


I think the purchases have largely been opportunistic when clubs were financially precarious.

We are in rude health, that has to be worth more.
 
I think the purchases have largely been opportunistic when clubs were financially precarious.

We are in rude health, that has to be worth more.
It is true that when some of the clubs were sold they were financially less stable but when one of the world's most famous football clubs (Manure) couldn't find an outright buyer are the valuations too high.
Re our position, we are in good financial health but I believe any debt has to be taken into account when applying a valuation.
 
It is true that when some of the clubs were sold they were financially less stable but when one of the world's most famous football clubs (Manure) couldn't find an outright buyer are the valuations too high.
Re our position, we are in good financial health but I believe any debt has to be taken into account when applying a valuation.

I think there is an element of the valuations being right but there not being buyers out there..........the global financial state is hardly in great shape at the moment.
 
I think there is an element of the valuations being right but there not being buyers out there..........the global financial state is hardly in great shape at the moment.
I just wonder if middle east buyers want to pay in the billions for a football club, Toon, Man C and PSG were all purchased for quite low amounts, not sure if any other major clubs have had large middle east takeovers. Trying to research the Chelsea bids not sure if there were any middle east consortiums involved , all I can find are Americans and one British bid and Jassim thought Manure were overpriced, perhaps they want more value for their money.
I don't particularly want foreign owners so it will have to be Levy for the foreseeable unless Adele would like to put a bid in :)
 
I just wonder if middle east buyers want to pay in the billions for a football club, Toon, Man C and PSG were all purchased for quite low amounts, not sure if any other major clubs have had large middle east takeovers. Trying to research the Chelsea bids not sure if there were any middle east consortiums involved , all I can find are Americans and one British bid and Jassim thought Manure were overpriced, perhaps they want more value for their money.
I don't particularly want foreign owners so it will have to be Levy for the foreseeable unless Adele would like to put a bid in :)

Yeh could be some truth in that.

Also Saudi went through a mediator, albeit to navigate the no Saudi stuff, but even their process was, in the words of PIF, a cheaper access route into the sport, whilst getting the riches and access route through TV and the deals.

From what I was told, which is why, for one of 100 reasons I don't trust the blokes words on that podcast, is the Qatari bid was a feeling out and for a smaller stake, not the whole club......they didn't want the whole thing yet.
 
From what I was told, which is why, for one of 100 reasons I don't trust the blokes words on that podcast, is the Qatari bid was a feeling out and for a smaller stake, not the whole club......they didn't want the whole thing yet.
Didn't listen to it all but the moment I heard him mention underground station I knew he didn't have a clue, the Victoria line extension has been as dead as a Dodo for years and if the Qataris do want to discuss the Underground they need to talk to Sadiq Khan and TFL not Levy.
 
I think there is an element of the valuations being right but there not being buyers out there..........the global financial state is hardly in great shape at the moment.

I just wonder if middle east buyers want to pay in the billions for a football club, Toon, Man C and PSG were all purchased for quite low amounts, not sure if any other major clubs have had large middle east takeovers. Trying to research the Chelsea bids not sure if there were any middle east consortiums involved , all I can find are Americans and one British bid and Jassim thought Manure were overpriced, perhaps they want more value for their money.
I don't particularly want foreign owners so it will have to be Levy for the foreseeable unless Adele would like to put a bid in :)
Realistically there is the Middle East and Tech bros.

And what I mean by that is people/companies/countries that have significant amounts of money but is insignificant to them when talking about 3-5bn when viewed through an '£ investment ' lense. ie the investment has higher priorities above the ROI.

With regards of price/valuation, one has to remember is it comes with a best in class new stadium. Building something similar today will cost 2bn+ and a complete ball ache. Chelsea, United and Saudi Sportswashing Machine all need that.

If you deduct our debt and built stadium value out of the asking price...you'd be lucky to ask for 1bn.
 
Realistically there is the Middle East and Tech bros.

And what I mean by that is people/companies/countries that have significant amounts of money but is insignificant to them when talking about 3-5bn when viewed through an '£ investment ' lense. ie the investment has higher priorities above the ROI.

With regards of price/valuation, one has to remember is it comes with a best in class new stadium. Building something similar today will cost 2bn+ and a complete ball ache. Chelsea, United and Saudi Sportswashing Machine all need that.

If you deduct our debt and built stadium value out of the asking price...you'd be lucky to ask for 1bn.

I think mentioned on here before that many financial experts have had their say on our value one guy for Forbes in and interview said given the land owned, the property portfolio and the future proof of the business with its growing interests AND given the revenue times multiplier which many use to work out a companies value........he saw what we wanted as high but not out of this world..........
 
Didn't listen to it all but the moment I heard him mention underground station I knew he didn't have a clue, the Victoria line extension has been as dead as a Dodo for years and if the Qataris do want to discuss the Underground they need to talk to Sadiq Khan and TFL not Levy.
He does mention Sadiq Khan. Listen to it all
 
I think mentioned on here before that many financial experts have had their say on our value one guy for Forbes in and interview said given the land owned, the property portfolio and the future proof of the business with its growing interests AND given the revenue times multiplier which many use to work out a companies value........he saw what we wanted as high but not out of this world..........
Listen to this pod where a finance guy discusses many different ways of valuing THFC

 
I think mentioned on here before that many financial experts have had their say on our value one guy for Forbes in and interview said given the land owned, the property portfolio and the future proof of the business with its growing interests AND given the revenue times multiplier which many use to work out a companies value........he saw what we wanted as high but not out of this world..........
The revenue multiplier is a weird one with football clubs...as you can increase the income but it all goes out the door, with no guarantees it ups your competitive.
Of course, that's all relative to other clubs BUT different to other business sectors.
 
He does mention Sadiq Khan. Listen to it all
He has more info on the subject than I gave him credit for then . The Victoria line has the most frequent train service of any line in the UK and apparently the second most frequent in the world , at busy times one train every 100 seconds on average so it certainly looks like you couldn't add in any more trains .
If an extention was built from Seven Sisters to NP or wherever this would be detrimental to the service between SS and Walthamstow Central as some northbound trains would serve the extension so causing overcrowding at busy times on Walthamstow bound trains and it's an unknown what sort of frequency of trains could be maintained on any such extension. TFL have considered the requests for an extension in the past but have always come to the same conclusion that north Tottenham is well served by two overground lines and it can't be justified, it may change in the future but it won't be any time soon.
 
Last edited:
Back