• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ITK Thread

Lemonade Money said:
Transfermarket says primary position is 10, but sometimes plays on the left.
Click to expand...
True. For England Tucel played Eze as a second striker. I recon Eze would be better on the right than as a striker tho. Left suits him best imo as he can cut in on his favoured foot and shoot. But he could play a range of different positions. Coming in off the left is probably optimal, but who knows.
 
Haven't seen Eze play off the right but bet he's like every other right footer whose touted as able to and about 30% of the himself when moved there. We need players in their right positions. Even Son who is very two footed hasn't played off the right in over five years.
 
If there was ever a player that should play for Spurs is Eze, streaky, doesn’t always turn up for games, doesn’t influence the game to match his ability, but he will put in some class performances and we will all think how amazing he is. Not worth the money. I would be looking at Wharton over Eze
 
I think Eze is being massively mis-profiled here. Many are talking about him being an option for the left and yes he is but that really not his primary position. If you've largely seen him for England you might think that's his role but he plays centrally for Palace (while favouring the left of centre) and all his good work, performances goals, assists etc have come while playing that centre role. If you even watch a compilation of his best bits you'll notice the pattern of him working from the middle. We won't be buying Eze to start as our LWF, he would be coming in as a left of centre attacker and realistically as direct competition for Maddison and Kulu.

I'm not sure if hes the best option to be honest because he would certainly add dynamism and ball retention to the forward area but like mentioned he's not really a dictator and has never really shown a consistent thread of the needle style through ball to be a main stay in his game.

I suppose it's all still up in the air until we see how Frank really intends to set us out (there is a brick ton of assumptions being made), but I think he would thrive in a big spaces type team as opposed to a one that regularly faces off against massed closed passing lanes defensive sides.
 
Gazza said:
If there was ever a player that should play for Spurs is Eze, streaky, doesn’t always turn up for games, doesn’t influence the game to match his ability, but he will put in some class performances and we will all think how amazing he is. Not worth the money. I would be looking at Wharton over Eze
Click to expand...

I think Eze and Maddison are a bit identikit. I think Eze is slightly better, and a bit younger, but I'm not overwhelmed by the need to twist. Kulu is also better than both in that role IMO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back