We did the same with kulu, romero and porro. So not sure how close to the limit they were or if it's just some funky way clubs do business now.
Honestly i have no idea.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Financial Fair Play
- Thread starter NewmarketYid
- Start date
We did the same with kulu, romero and porro. So not sure how close to the limit they were or if it's just some funky way clubs do business now.
Honestly i have no idea.
Chrissivad
Sergei Rebrov
I don't know about Kulusevski, Bentancur or Romero, but I'm sure Porro was to help sporting.
Others would be Paratici deals
Just saying loan to buy seems fairly common now. Might not be an inclination of a club close to psr. Might just help with cash flow.
As i said i don't know. So we can move on.
Bullet
Luka Modric
The financial experts on a podcast said this, they know what they are on about
Fair enough. But they've had a season of cl football with all the financial benefits that go with it. I doubt they are in any fincial difficulties now.
Bedfordspurs
Arthur Rowe
A worthy read if you have time
One thing it mentions.
"Emirates Marketing Project sought to challenge the investigation over many years in the UK Courts of Law, thereby delaying the investigation and subsequent prosecution."
City lost those cases. Hence why the charges were made. I know you are a cynic but there is a reason why the world uses british courts and legal representation. Because they are regarded as the best and least corrupt in the world. Our own government lose in the courts often. The lastest regarding their plans to tackle climate change which the court ruled as inadequate.
Both sides will be represented by kc's. And it will be judged by kc's.
The problem is it's a case of fraud. Proving not just city, but their accountants, sponsors, and the uae itself provided false documentation. Which itself may be a criminal offence.
As the article says "The nature of the accusation is complex and the Premier League lacks broad powers of investigation because it is not a Government body".
Emirates Marketing Project are not just going to buy their way out of it. But it's going to be hard to prove.
Chelsea on the other hand have admitted to it. Their charges should be brought soon.