• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The Danielle Wosserface Thread

If I'm on the tube Its dog eat dog. I'm getting a seat. Don't care who is left standing.

I only take the seat next to the window/glass partition. Otherwise im standing. If your disabled or preggers (dangerous game that as there are fat women about) I will be the first to get up wherever it is im sitting.
 
As I'm not sure, are you a woman?:)


Because if not your making some pretty bold claims about 'what women want'..


In fact i'd go so far as to say that what women want varies from woman to woman...


Edit: Men were being men, and then women wanted equality. They can't have it both ways.

Of course equality is the right way but never lose your identity.
From experience, women want a man to be a man who can make decisions and is Quirky.. and of course you better give her a good filling!
 
Yet as I said in another thread if you didn't know her and she came onto you in a club you'd be leaving early. She's a pretty girl. Yeah she's slept around, and I get that you don't respect her for that, and I detest the whole wag culture we live in nowadays.

I'm not denying that at all but after finding out all her conquests (some of them being work colleagues/friends) i certainly wouldn't be asking her to marry me that's for sure.
 
You can make a premiership X1 from the guys she's been with.


---------------------------------Bosnich---------------------------------------

Hutton----------------Pique----------------Huddlestone---------------Traore

---------Jenas------------------O'Hara---------------------Babel------------

-----------------Defoe------Sheringham--------D.Bent------------------------


subs: Marcus Bent.



These are the ones that have been reported. I cannot respect a woman like that tbh and if anyone actually watched her on Celebrity Big Brother you would have seen what a nasty piece of work this 'woman' is.
Right, I'm not saying she has changed (and I don't watch BB so have slightly lost track of timescales here) but do you see it as inconceivable she has changed? Not defending her bad behaviour, just asking.
 
I'm not denying that at all but after finding out all her conquests (some of them being work colleagues/friends) i certainly wouldn't be asking her to marry me that's for sure.

No and I respect that totally. Nor would I. Does that make us shallow? So be it.
 
Of course equality is the right way but never lose your identity.
From experience, women want a man to be a man who can make decisions and is Quirky.. and of course you better give her a good filling!


Equality is by definition the loss of identity.

It is being equal, two things can only be seen to be equal when they are seen as the same, thus it must incur a loss of identity.



(For the record, I think this equality thing that gets thrown around is a load of crap, women and men shouldn't be seen as the same, because they're not the same. Men are better at some things, Women are better at others. People should just deal with it)
 
I'm not denying that at all but after finding out all her conquests (some of them being work colleagues/friends) i certainly wouldn't be asking her to marry me that's for sure.
I agree, if you can't let it go then you can't let it go, who needs a relationship with an Elephant in the room*?



*Not an Adele reference.
373049_9770929278_422928250_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Right, I'm not saying she has changed (and I don't watch BB so have slightly lost track of timescales here) but do you see it as inconceivable she has changed? Not defending her bad behaviour, just asking.

Honestly mate i don't think she's changed. The time span from her last 'relationship' where we'd still consider her a slut to this Jamie O'hara relationship is a few months at best so i can't see how she could change so drastically in such a short space of time. This 'woman' was engaged to some taco DJ called 'dj Ironik' just a few months before getting with O'Hara ffs (wasn't she also engaged to Sheringham?).

Imho this was her intention all along whilst sleeping about. To find some gullable loved up 'celebrity' dumb enough to marry her and thus ensuring she's financially stable for years to come. He's now got children with her which means she'll be living off his ££££ when they eventually divorce regardless of a prenup .
 
Look mate - values are not always there. Values, morals, ethics are all things that develop over time through learning. For example I want a woman who is honest, any woman who isnt can fudge off. Why? because I am honest and why am I honest? because I have been hurt by lies in the past. That doesnt mean I have never lied but it means that I have learnt from that.

Same thing. We were all young once, you can get caught up in so much brick that life is moving faster than you think and its only when the brick hits the fan that you pause and think and THEN you change and have your value and morals and ethics.

Theyre not low standards. its called understanding the past is the past BUT you wont tolerate any of her brick or her past being relived whilst she is with you. That is stamping your authority so to speak not dismissing her because she may have stolen an apple ten years ago but you dont approve of stealing.

I think they key is to try and realize when it's time to grow up. It's about respect really. That's all. And there appears to be a double-standard when it comes to loose men versus loose women (whatever 'loose' means to be fair)...it seems fine for a bloke to be a right 'geezer' and sleep with loads of women, but when women do it, they immediately become (fill in the blank)...

I think a lot of men are afraid of women deep down. I think women scare them. They don't know how to be around them, so it's easier to fall back into lad-type.
 
I'm not denying that at all but after finding out all her conquests (some of them being work colleagues/friends) i certainly wouldn't be asking her to marry me that's for sure.

But that's YOUR CHOICE!!!

O'Hara loves her and wants to be married to her. So why does it become some low-grade footballer to start blasting twitter with his flimflam? It's like people who hate homosexuals, I mean seriously, it's not anyone's business who they love or how they get off (as long as it doesn't hurt anyone and as long as it's within the law).

I'll give you an example from my perspective. Nothing seems weirder to me than 50-something guys going out with girls in their young 20s, but I wouldn't comment on it as it's not mine to do so.
 
To find some gullable loved up 'celebrity' dumb enough to marry her and thus ensuring she's financially stable for years to come.
And there's a point, I know it's fashionable to mock the church but didn't the Archbishop of Canterbury come out recently and decry slebs who use engagement and marriage as career advancement ploys rather than something to be cherished between a loving couple? Alex Reid & Chantelle Houghton spring to mind.
 
Honestly, they all become identikit footballer's molls after a while, if you gave me a picture of Abby Crouch and Danielle Wosserface I couldn't tell them apart.
 
And there's a point, I know it's fashionable to mock the church but didn't the Archbishop of Canterbury come out recently and decry slebs who use engagement and marriage as career advancement ploys rather than something to be cherished between a loving couple? Alex Reid & Chantelle Houghton spring to mind.


The thing that astounded me about the ferocity of Knight's tweeting (and the subsequent thread) was just how utterly vitriolic people got regarding a relationship they simply do not know. if a person is defined by the behavior of their youth, if progression is denied based on behavior when young, then I suspect there are a lot of people who deserve the same coating of utter brick that Knight came out with, starting with him! It's like people who knocked Anna Nicole Smith and her oldie. I thought the whole thing was pretty weird and distasteful, but somehow THEY felt OK about it, so good for them, right? The old boy certainly didn't appear unhappy before he passed!
 
This is the point I made in the other thread. I know a few on here have kids, and once a lady becomes a mother, she is off limits. I don't care if she's the biggest fluffy bunnies cuddling in town, if the husband loves her and she treats her kids right, then any bloke who thinks they have the right to pass judgement is a scumbag.

I've never been the biggest JO'H fan, but so far he's managed to keep quiet on all this so respect to him.
 
This is the point I made in the other thread. I know a few on here have kids, and once a lady becomes a mother, she is off limits. I don't care if she's the biggest fluffy bunnies cuddling in town, if the husband loves her and she treats her kids right, then any bloke who thinks they have the right to pass judgement is a scumbag.

I've never been the biggest JO'H fan, but so far he's managed to keep quiet on all this so respect to him.

Agreed!
 
This is the point I made in the other thread. I know a few on here have kids, and once a lady becomes a mother, she is off limits. I don't care if she's the biggest fluffy bunnies cuddling in town, if the husband loves her and she treats her kids right, then any bloke who thinks they have the right to pass judgement is a scumbag.

I've never been the biggest JO'H fan, but so far he's managed to keep quiet on all this so respect to him.

I don't buy that, respect for everyone or respect for no-one, bearing children does not give you right to be above disapproval.

And on that note I'm off up the wooden hill to Bedfordshire, great chat tonight, thanks gents.
 
Gordinho, about 12 months ago I would have had the same opinion. Not that your opinion is wrong, but that's where my opinion is coming from.
 
Back