• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Mauricio Pochettino - Sacked

So are you saying that IF a player wants more money ( wages) then the buying club is willing to pay that Levy should make it up for him???? If i have that wrong i am sorry but if that is what you are suggesting then (imo) that is silly at best.

You would surprised how much this happens, the selling club makes up the wages to match what he is on until what would have been the end of his contract with the sellers, it’s ridiculous but footballers live on a different planet in certain aspects.
 
At least one of the players turned down a move over money only. This could've been resolved by Levy swallowing his pride. There were also a number of clubs interested in Danny Rose but a combination of the transfer fee that we wanted and his wage package put them off (again something that I think could've been resolved had we had a DoF in this role instead of Levy).
Who was that?
 
You would surprised how much this happens, the selling club makes up the wages to match what he is on until what would have been the end of his contract with the sellers, it’s ridiculous but footballers live on a different planet in certain aspects.

Not saying it has never happened but ( imo) we are not a charity and we should not be dragged into being one.
 
Not saying it has never happened but ( imo) we are not a charity and we should not be dragged into being one.

Completely agree but these player are living and working in a environment where it’s considered completely normal and they will wrongly see Levy as the bad guy for not doing it, players that do this it shows you exactly where their motivations lie.
 
Completely agree but these player are living and working in a environment where it’s considered completely normal and they will wrongly see Levy as the bad guy for not doing it, players that do this it shows you exactly where their motivations lie.

Without a doubt, none of us really know what bids came in ( or not) for certain players in the summer. More then likely the players who were up for moving could not attract the level of teams that we are at, not surprised really as Rose has been poor for a couple of seasons and Toby looks like he is over the hill as well.
 
If you don't believe very credible people who said Poch refused several signings the summer we didn't sign anyone.

I do which is what I said in my post. But he obviously didn't back Poch with the players he wanted or clear out some deadwood and for that Levy is culpable for the current situation.
 
So are you saying that IF a player wants more money ( wages) then the buying club is willing to pay that Levy should make it up for him???? If i have that wrong i am sorry but if that is what you are suggesting then (imo) that is silly at best.

If the manager wants rid, then backing him might include some financial cost.

Same when the manager wants a new player, or wants a new contract for a player.

There is also the completely valid point Finney of the cost of not selling.

We apparently agreed a deal for Wanyama at about £13m. And reportedly it collapsed on wage demands.

Should we, A) Sell at £10m, to compensate for that wage issue and make the deal happen, and please the manager, or
B) Refuse to sell, spend a year on wages (£60k a week?) and likely sell the following summer for pennies...
 
If the manager wants rid, then backing him might include some financial cost.

Same when the manager wants a new player, or wants a new contract for a player.

There is also the completely valid point Finney of the cost of not selling.

We apparently agreed a deal for Wanyama at about £13m. And reportedly it collapsed on wage demands.

Should we, A) Sell at £10m, to compensate for that wage issue and make the deal happen, and please the manager, or
B) Refuse to sell, spend a year on wages (£60k a week?) and likely sell the following summer for pennies...

Or the players should stop asking for more then the buying club thinks he is worth, Rose has always overvalued himself ( imo) and Wanyama is doing the same ( alledgely). I have complete faith in Levy to make the deal or not and as i said earlier we are not a charity.
 
Or the players should stop asking for more then the buying club thinks he is worth, Rose has always overvalued himself ( imo) and Wanyama is doing the same ( alledgely). I have complete faith in Levy to make the deal or not and as i said earlier we are not a charity.

As always, the players hold the aces.

If we want him to go, then we need to make it agreeable for him to move. Its not up to him to take a pay cut if he doesnt want to.

If we want to back our manager, why not make the deal happen? We would still be profiting, albeit slightly less, on the deal. Compared to the likelihood of us now getting even less than that when he does eventually go.
 
As always, the players hold the aces.

If we want him to go, then we need to make it agreeable for him to move. Its not up to him to take a pay cut if he doesnt want to.

If we want to back our manager, why not make the deal happen? We would still be profiting, albeit slightly less, on the deal. Compared to the likelihood of us now getting even less than that when he does eventually go.

I understand your point of view but as i said i trust Levy to do the right thing and IF that means not becoming a charity i fully support it.
 
I understand your point of view but as i said i trust Levy to do the right thing and IF that means not becoming a charity i fully support it.

It doesnt mean becoming a charity.

It means keeping a player the manager doesnt want, paying him all season, and losing out over all financially.

Now, I trust Levy, I support him a lot more than many on here who like to blame him for everything, but sometimes it is completely fair to raise an eyebrow and wonder what he is playing at.

And this is one of those. He basically shot himself in the foot*.



*If it was actually Wanyamas wage demands that scuppered the deal. Who knows, maybe he didnt fancy Belgium?
 
It doesnt mean becoming a charity.

It means keeping a player the manager doesnt want, paying him all season, and losing out over all financially.

Now, I trust Levy, I support him a lot more than many on here who like to blame him for everything, but sometimes it is completely fair to raise an eyebrow and wonder what he is playing at.

And this is one of those. He basically shot himself in the foot*.



*If it was actually Wanyamas wage demands that scuppered the deal. Who knows, maybe he didnt fancy Belgium?

Who knows we as fans are kept in the dark as to what really goes on behind the scenes, so many of us have opinions that are usually no more then guess work most of the time. Passes the time though :)
 
If the manager wants rid, then backing him might include some financial cost.

Same when the manager wants a new player, or wants a new contract for a player.

There is also the completely valid point Finney of the cost of not selling.

We apparently agreed a deal for Wanyama at about £13m. And reportedly it collapsed on wage demands.

Should we, A) Sell at £10m, to compensate for that wage issue and make the deal happen, and please the manager, or
B) Refuse to sell, spend a year on wages (£60k a week?) and likely sell the following summer for pennies...

Wanyama collapsed on his side delaying the move and they wanted to move quickly due to The CL

Players we want rid of are because their not performing so how can they expect a pay rise? Don’t forget their generally entitled to a pay off go go if they haven’t put in a transfer request

Similarly to shift players you need a buyer. Look at Jansen. Who could have seen a player from this league going to Mexico??

I think we have done well shifting dead wood of late but it’s nor easy as we do pay better than most and London and the EPL is popular
 
The beIN SPORTS anchor says he has been told that Pochettino has now lost the dressing room.

Richard Keys wrote on his blog: "I certainly didn’t expect the mess that’s developed at Spurs. Pochettino has got to go. Pochettino will go.

"It’s the only way to start the healing process. Both he and that dressing room need a new start.


"They’ve grown tired of each other. It’s as true today as it always was – either change the coach regularly, or the players.

"The latter isn’t going to happen so it’s got to be Poch.

"I’m being told that he’s lost the players. As we know, that only ends one way."


Im guessing he isnt being told a damn thing. I didnt even realise this clam was still working. Please tell me he hasnt got Andy Gray still on the tv as well?!
 
Actually the Guillem Balague Podcast @nayimfromthehalfwayline posted above is a very fair listen. It does seem more his opinion looking from outside but with some knowledge of how Pochettino likes to operate tactically.

Good listen imo, and some interesting bits on Pep seeking advice on "if/when players stop listening" from SAF and Rafa Benitez..

Phew!
 
Wanyama collapsed on his side delaying the move and they wanted to move quickly due to The CL

Players we want rid of are because their not performing so how can they expect a pay rise? Don’t forget their generally entitled to a pay off go go if they haven’t put in a transfer request

Similarly to shift players you need a buyer. Look at Jansen. Who could have seen a player from this league going to Mexico??

I think we have done well shifting dead wood of late but it’s nor easy as we do pay better than most and London and the EPL is popular

I think our inability to shift players is over stated, to be honest.

As you mention Jansen, I mean - fudging great work to pull that one off! Likewise NKoudou.

If I had to guess Id say Wanyama had second thoughts about Belgium, its bascially semi retirement (though, sadly, probably about his level).
 
The beIN SPORTS anchor says he has been told that Pochettino has now lost the dressing room.

Richard Keys wrote on his blog: "I certainly didn’t expect the mess that’s developed at Spurs. Pochettino has got to go. Pochettino will go.

"It’s the only way to start the healing process. Both he and that dressing room need a new start.


"They’ve grown tired of each other. It’s as true today as it always was – either change the coach regularly, or the players.

"The latter isn’t going to happen so it’s got to be Poch.

"I’m being told that he’s lost the players. As we know, that only ends one way."


Im guessing he isnt being told a damn thing. I didnt even realise this clam was still working. Please tell me he hasnt got Andy Gray still on the tv as well?!
Yup the 2 of them are still doing punditry for bein sports in Qatar, perhaps they went to Pochettino’s seminar...

 
The beIN SPORTS anchor says he has been told that Pochettino has now lost the dressing room.

Richard Keys wrote on his blog: "I certainly didn’t expect the mess that’s developed at Spurs. Pochettino has got to go. Pochettino will go.

"It’s the only way to start the healing process. Both he and that dressing room need a new start.


"They’ve grown tired of each other. It’s as true today as it always was – either change the coach regularly, or the players.

"The latter isn’t going to happen so it’s got to be Poch.

"I’m being told that he’s lost the players. As we know, that only ends one way."


Im guessing he isnt being told a damn thing. I didnt even realise this clam was still working. Please tell me he hasnt got Andy Gray still on the tv as well?!

Yep he and Gray are the main men on Bien Sports, he knows brick and he is still a gobby brick.
 
Back