I’m not arguing. Somebody listed names of existing prem players we’d signed (might have been you). And I said, “like I say, no real impact on the first team” (or similar).
My original point was that we’d been a bit too youthy with our signings - think most would acknowledge that. Even the club did.
My second point after the follow up was more tongue in cheek as I realised our experienced prem signings haven’t really delivered either. But they were intended to.
Do I have a problem with our policy? I think we left ourselves very light on experience going into a season with 4 competitions. Our league position clarifies that as were unable to be competitive (even after the injuries) as we focused our main players on one competition.
As I said in my follow up. Some balance is needed. Bergval, Gray, Vilez, Vuskovic, Yang, Odobert, Philips. We’re north of £100m there which economically won’t hurt us in the long run. But none of them were intended to make an impact straight away so it left us short.
I noticed on Sky yesterday we were listed as the 4th biggest spenders over 2 years (something like £400m) and 3rd biggest net spenders (something like £200m). A lot of that has gone on youth.