• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

*******Spurs v PSG*******Official OMT*******

Unique worth the entrance fee to see him even on a bad day.
I was the arsenal game when he lost his boot and scored without it
Think we lost IIRC
Was standing in the old north stand with my bro and dad
We went nuts
Meg Gazza quite a few times and every time he seems more and more “gone” 😢
 
If a shot taken has a high xg then surely by definition it is a good chance that has been created? Whether or not the person on the end of the shot has good finishing ability doesn't change that. Agree on the cumulative figures.
Yes but you find that most people don't talk about the individual shot in terms of xG, they tend to talk about team xG. But I'll admit in the example you gave it's a reasonable description of how often someone would finish a chance taken from that spot.
 
Here's a question for all you xPerts.

When Spence got to the by-line last night, refused to use his left foot and then got his right foot cross blocked at source what does that do for xG. He could clearly slide it into the 18 yard box with his left if he wasn't being such a numpty. There should have been a chance created.
The answer is Jane, and she 1.6m from the nearest fire extinguisher.
 
Yes but you find that most people don't talk about the individual shot in terms of xG, they tend to talk about team xG. But I'll admit in the example you gave it's a reasonable description of how often someone would finish a chance taken from that spot.

As you mentioned earlier it needs to be viewed alongside no. of shots to have any meaning in that regard
 
Back