As I posted yesterday, this could be a reason why we didnt go for Ndicka, or alternatively something which is enabled by Roma signing him
Very good player and I think one who is suited to playing Postecoglou's tactics. Would be a good, sensible signing.As I posted yesterday, this could be a reason why we didnt go for Ndicka, or alternatively something which is enabled by Roma signing him
As I posted yesterday, this could be a reason why we didnt go for Ndicka, or alternatively something which is enabled by Roma signing him
He is right footed but on the occasions he isn’t benched, Roma switch to a back three with Ibanez on the left side.
Darren Gibson to partner him?As I posted yesterday, this could be a reason why we didnt go for Ndicka, or alternatively something which is enabled by Roma signing him
Why would we want another dm?
Isn't he primarily a CB?
Do they think Ndicka is an upgrade? I don't understand why they want to sell/replace him if he's decent ?
Because bringing in Ndicka on a free and getting 30m for Ibanez digs them out of an FFP hole.Do they think Ndicka is an upgrade? I don't understand why they want to sell/replace him if he's decent ?
Yes and the right sort of player for Postecoglou's system. This would be a sensible signing.Isn't he primarily a CB?
Because bringing in Ndicka on a free and getting 30m for Ibanez digs them out of an FFP hole.
Because bringing in Ndicka on a free and getting 30m for Ibanez digs them out of an FFP hole.
Yep, Roma are paying the price on two bug spending years (relative to them) and some outstanding wages...
Bit of jiggery pokery on their part
Not winning that Europa Final and getting a CL spot is probably an issue too
They were banking on CL football from what I could gather from following Lazio.
Problem is, for all the cup stuff they have been average in the league TBH