• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Roberto De Zerbi *OFFICIAL*

Mighty Yids vs Dirty Lids

DCL is certainly a big threat in the air. Likes to score at home, 4 Prem goals at home this year.

View attachment 23606


He has really turned around his terrible fitness record. I wonder how?
This article doesn't give any particular answer, but it does have some interesting bits if you're bored.

consistency. That’s what the 29-year-old striker has found at Leeds. It was his arrival at Leeds, in many ways, that was the springboard. Leaving Everton in 2025 was a big decision, particularly given his connection to the club. It came during a period of change off the field, too, as he adjusted to fatherhood and married life. It was time, he said, to start a new journey.

Leeds and Daniel Farke will be glad he did. Since the forward’s arrival, only four Premier League players have a better goal-per-game ratio than Calvert-Lewin. Over the last 15 months, he’s scored 20 goals. Across his final four seasons at Everton, the ones that came after his career-best 21-goal season, he netted just 18.

Calvert-Lewin is in the 95th percentile in distance covered. He's in the 74th percentile in top speed. Yes, he leads the league in aerial duels, but he's also significantly more mobile than people give him credit for.
Hold up!

The OMT has landed.
 
That's me looking forward to the weekend then.

So, more on the question of the defense, here's a view of our first 6 games vs. last 3 in the league

Defense improvements

1793911085516.png

Controlling game (which is the old, if you have the ball, the opposition can't hurt you)

1793911197811.png

Interesting how the goals came as well

1793911265020.png

Full video for anyone interested

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Some interesting points

- Good to call out ref issue, nothing for Tel tackle, yellow for tackle where Porro won ball
- Called out the players but kept it as part of the "learning process"
- Caught some of the observations in general (e.g. Kudus tired)
- Maddison only trained one day, and choice was him (in middle?) or LWB left
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Some interesting points

- Good to call out ref issue, nothing for Tel tackle, yellow for tackle where Porro won ball
- Called out the players but kept it as part of the "learning process"
- Caught some of the observations in general (e.g. Kudus tired)
- Maddison only trained one day, and choice was him (in middle?) or LWB left

I think this is a game which really shows how many injuries we have in the attacking spots. Leeds away is a hard game and we ended up way down our list of options in those spots.

I don’t know how RDZ solves it, but I am getting completely fed up with our players making bad decisions in the final third. I can’t work out whether it’s stupid, or selfish, or lazy, or more generously ‘lacking confidence’ in those areas and therefore snatching at stuff.

But it is extremely obvious that when LWB gets the ball in the final third, he slows down. He lets the opportunity appear and goes after it. I think Madders and Xavi are this way too, and Savio. But today we just had none of it on the pitch.

Kudus took a 30 yarder when we had players busting a gut to get forward and outnumbered Leeds. Porro hit the first man on a cross when we had an overload in their box. Marmoush snatched at a chance where he could have squad it to Kudus. They’re just going for the easiest, laziest options, smashing the ball. They need to fake, they need to work an angle, and then get into the space that opens up.

Even if they don’t feel confident to do the fakes, I don’t think there’s any excuse for not being aware of what options are around them, and being able to judge whether a long ranger or a snatched contested shot is the highest percentage play. It’s seriously getting on my nerves now. Because these are good players, and top level professionals should be able to see the picture of the game around them.
 
What is RDZ playing at? Take the Leeds match, for example—he puts a right-back in a position that’s practically a number 10 role?
What’s his deal with constantly trying to tinker with things, only to land us in trouble?
Guardiola used to pull some strange stunts back in the day, too.

I think he should stick to the fundamentals and stop playing guys out of position.
He’s falling back into the same habits he had at Marseille—just keep things simple! This approach only ends up confusing our players.
 
I think this is a game which really shows how many injuries we have in the attacking spots. Leeds away is a hard game and we ended up way down our list of options in those spots.

I don’t know how RDZ solves it, but I am getting completely fed up with our players making bad decisions in the final third. I can’t work out whether it’s stupid, or selfish, or lazy, or more generously ‘lacking confidence’ in those areas and therefore snatching at stuff.

But it is extremely obvious that when LWB gets the ball in the final third, he slows down. He lets the opportunity appear and goes after it. I think Madders and Xavi are this way too, and Savio. But today we just had none of it on the pitch.

Kudus took a 30 yarder when we had players busting a gut to get forward and outnumbered Leeds. Porro hit the first man on a cross when we had an overload in their box. Marmoush snatched at a chance where he could have squad it to Kudus. They’re just going for the easiest, laziest options, smashing the ball. They need to fake, they need to work an angle, and then get into the space that opens up.

Even if they don’t feel confident to do the fakes, I don’t think there’s any excuse for not being aware of what options are around them, and being able to judge whether a long ranger or a snatched contested shot is the highest percentage play. It’s seriously getting on my nerves now. Because these are good players, and top level professionals should be able to see the picture of the game around them.
To build on what you said, if we look at our midfielders and forwards one by one, none of them really stand out in terms of assists or goals—and that goes for the defensive players too, with the exception of one season in Germany for marmoush. Last year, we had Romero in defense, who was a real threat during corners and free kicks; the same goes for Palhinha, who—despite playing as a defensive midfielder—would push forward to score. That’s an innate quality, and personally, I don’t see it in any of our current playersI think Tel has that, but you’d have to play him as a number 9 to see it—though RDZ has blinders on.
No one takes the initiative to play a dangerous first-time pass, take a direct shot, or deliver a cross without needing to control the ball first. As a result, opposing defenders always have plenty of time to get back into position.
 
Last edited:
What is RDZ playing at? Take the Leeds match, for example—he puts a right-back in a position that’s practically a number 10 role?
What’s his deal with constantly trying to tinker with things, only to land us in trouble?
Guardiola used to pull some strange stunts back in the day, too.

I think he should stick to the fundamentals and stop playing guys out of position.
He’s falling back into the same habits he had at Marseille—just keep things simple! This approach only ends up confusing our players.

Think you are overthinking it

- Gray is a defensive midfielder with ball carrying ability (who happens to cover RB for us), he expected Leeds to pack 5 in midfield to try to press/bully us. I suspect the plan was to gain control of game and bring on more attacking players in 2nd half (Maddison)
- His tinkering worked against United/Coventry/Chelsea/Palace, it didn't here, it happens.

He doesn't have a full team yet to play everyone in position, Maddison wasn't ready, Savio is still out, Deki is nowhere near match fit or in form.

Doesn't mean I agree with his decisions against Leeds, but what he did isn't' that way out there.
 
Yeah, sometimes I overthink things a bit too much.
As for Archi, though—he’s a defensive midfielder by trade, but on Saturday I felt like I saw him playing a bit further up the pitch.
 
Yeah, sometimes I overthink things a bit too much.
As for Archi, though—he’s a defensive midfielder by trade, but on Saturday I felt like I saw him playing a bit further up the pitch.

He was, again agree with you, weird call, think RDZ was just too focused on countering Leeds.

For me, if we wanted to just counter the hustle, I would have started Gallagher and left Gray at RB (Porro is better if plan is to dominate the ball)
 
He was, again agree with you, weird call, think RDZ was just too focused on countering Leeds.

For me, if we wanted to just counter the hustle, I would have started Gallagher and left Gray at RB (Porro is better if plan is to dominate the ball)
That is exactly what I expected to see on Saturday.
But oh well, that’s how it is—it’s frustrating, because there was a chance to achieve something...
 
Back