Bullet
Colin Calderwood
His micropenis, presumably.Why can you never admit that you are just plain wrong?
His micropenis, presumably.Why can you never admit that you are just plain wrong?
It's all utterly disgusting, but not at all surprising.According to today’s Covid Inquiry evidence, Johnson seemed very keen to kill off a large proportion of his own voters.
IIRC, there is nothing coming out now, that we, the GG brain trust, didn't opine on at the time.
The government behaved exactly as we expected them too.
He had charisma…A great entertainer
Really?????
Wasn't his 80 seat majority some kind of record? Eitherway it was a landslide, one of the most popular votes in UK history. In a democractic sense he certainally had something.
It was. The discussion is whether a govt seizing assets is a deterrent to investment.That wasn't the debate either. Look, you just did it again...lol.
What has Gutterboy done to deserve a blow job?BJ to GB .....
Applies my inner Scara here - both things can be trueWell, some of us. There were a few who were strongly in the ‘He’s doing his best…’ camp.
His reputation from his terms as Mayor of London clearly put way above "just another backbencher". His tenures were widely considered innovative and greatly successful - he would have always been in discussions re; potential leaders and cabinet positions. To not include a successful major of the world's best city would have been considered political irresponsibilityWithout Brexit Boris was a back bench journalist MP. Good for a laugh on Have I Got News for You. He had charisma but no one believed he had what it took to lead the nation. Then Brexi and the spiral downwards….Cameron, May, Biris, and rock bottom Truss.
As Baleforce says Boris performed exactly as predicted. A great entertainer and predictably bad leader.
His reputation from his terms as Mayor of London clearly put way above "just another backbencher". His tenures were widely considered innovative and greatly successful - he would have always been in discussions re; potential leaders and cabinet positions. To not include a successful major of the world's best city would have been considered political irresponsibility
His reputation from his terms as Mayor of London clearly put way above "just another backbencher". His tenures were widely considered innovative and greatly successful - he would have always been in discussions re; potential leaders and cabinet positions. To not include a successful major of the world's best city would have been considered political irresponsibility