• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

Back to Nowaks murder. Who did beleive there was two tier policing was Digwas brother, family and legal team.

Why didn’t he just say they had been assaulted? Why did they continue this lie while Henry was near death infront of them? Why did they continue the lie as part of their defense? Why was an accusation of race something they believed would help them?
 
robp135 said:
Back to Nowaks murder. Who did beleive there was two tier policing was Digwas brother, family and legal team.

Why didn’t he just say they had been assaulted? Why did they continue this lie while Henry was near death infront of them? Why did they continue the lie as part of their defense? Why was an accusation of race something they believed would help them?
Click to expand...

Why does any family do it and cover for their loved ones? Why does anyone who is trying to hoodwink the police lie in order to cover someone's tracks?

Two tier policing would be the police choosing a side from an equal standing start, not because someone lied that they were being racially abused, they are totally different
 
MartyFunkhouser said:
Why does any family do it and cover for their loved ones? Why does anyone who is trying to hoodwink the police lie in order to cover someone's tracks?

Two tier policing would be the police choosing a side from an equal standing start, not because someone lied that they were being racially abused, they are totally different
Click to expand...

Why did they specifically accuse Nowak of being racist? They could have just said he was attacked and it was self defense. But racism was the primary part of their accusation. Why?
 
Last edited:
robp135 said:
Why did they specially accuse Nowak of being racist? They could have just said he was attacked and it was self defense. But racism was the primary part of their accusation. Why?
Click to expand...

Because he was a wrongun and likely wanted to lay on something of gravity to the claim........crying wolf on anything is peoples go to when they try and get out of things, its been the way since time immemorial.

If you are trying to believe that in the heat of the stabbing that the bloke who stabbed poor Novak took his time to calculate that two tier policing and DEI training might get him off the hook if he made the claim of racism then I think you are really trying to reach all for the sake of point scoring on here mate
 
Last edited:
MartyFunkhouser said:
Because people look for things that might add gravitas to their claim.

Why does anyone falsely claim things that they think might help theit case, when the police are not involved? Because they are looking fot a way out.
Click to expand...
Glenda's Legs said:
Well none of us can know for sure. However he has stabbed/killed someone and needs to justify his actions. Racially aggravated assault is a more serious crime than non-racially aggravated assault so it makes sense that he would pick the racial crime to bolster his defence.
Click to expand...

And the expectation was that would carry favour with the police and judiciary.

Now flip it. A white person in a town where they would be a minority. They stab someone, they call the police. Saying they have been racially abused by an Asian man. Is that taken as seriously as the accusation was here? The family arrives and back up the claim. Do the police take that seriously?
 
robp135 said:
And the expectation was that would carry favour with the police and judiciary.

Now flip it. A white person in a town where they would be a minority. They stab someone, they call the police. Saying they have been racially abused by an Asian man. Is that taken as seriously as the accusation was here? The family arrives and back up the claim. Do the police take that seriously?
Click to expand...

Well thats a totally different point.

But I think the police turn up to the behest of the person calling in the crime and grievance and go with bias towards that in the first instance, regardless.

Same as they do with many crimes that are called in
 
robp135 said:
And the expectation was that would carry favour with the police and judiciary.

Now flip it. A white person in a town where they would be a minority. They stab someone, they call the police. Saying they have been racially abused by an Asian man. Is that taken as seriously as the accusation was here? The family arrives and back up the claim. Do the police take that seriously?
Click to expand...
I would expect the police to take it seriously yes but unless you have an actual example it’s just whistling in the wind.
And regardless of expectation, Digwa was charged by the police with murder and a jury found him guilty of murder.
The fact that he tried to use racism in his defence clearly didn’t take any precedence over what the police, CPS and jury believed to have been what actually happened.
So what’s the issue?
 
I've spent a few days away from this thread for my mental health (I was going to say sanity - but I don't want to delete my account 🤣).

After a quick skim read, have I just come back to see some posters saying the death of Henry Novak was race related?!
If so, what d'afuk?!
 
monkeybarry said:
I've spent a few days away from this thread for my mental health (I was going to say sanity - but I don't want to delete my account 🤣).

After a quick skim read, have I just come back to see some posters saying the death of Henry Novak wasn’t race related?!
If so, what d'afuk?!
Click to expand...

Fixed for you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back