The fact that you don't rate Defoe is understadable, even if you go too far with your level of bias against him. But I really don't get why you rate Adebayor so much higher. To say he has flattered to deceive in his career is the understatement of the fudging century! At least Defoe doesn't have a questionable character and is reliable. He's always been described as an utter professional. I don't deny Adebayor has more talent, but if you look at the goal record of both strikers (which ultimately is what strikers are judged on), there isn't much to separate them. And don't you find it suspiscious that whilst Adebayor has always been seen as a player who can be world class on his day, he hasn't done it consistently enough throughout his career?
