If you had been raped, would £5m hush money be enough tempt you to not go through the trauma of a trial?
So traumatic she had 2 kids with him
If you had been raped, would £5m hush money be enough tempt you to not go through the trauma of a trial?
She’s still with him and it wasn’t just because she withdrew her evidence. The police said “new evidence came to light also”..
He was charged. They couldn't pursue a trial because the key witness withdrew their evidence.
It’s no gotcha at all. It’s just a fact as is the fact the case was dropped due to her withdrawing the accusations and new evidence coming to light.'She's still with him' is not a gotcha of any kind lads - as I said previously she wouldn't be the first person to stay with their abuser. That's her decision to make.
It’s no gotcha at all. It’s just a fact as is the fact the case was dropped due to her withdrawing the accusations and new evidence coming to light.
He may still have done what she accused him of. He may not. None of us knows.
But he wasn’t convicted of anything and that’s the barometer of guilt in any decent society, like it or not.
It’s no gotcha at all. It’s just a fact as is the fact the case was dropped due to her withdrawing the accusations and new evidence coming to light.
He may still have done what she accused him of. He may not. None of us knows.
But he wasn’t convicted of anything and that’s the barometer of guilt in any decent society, like it or not.
Reducing football clubs to "professional institutions" is undercooking it slightly to be fair. They're unique bodies that thousands of people have followed with a lot of emotion and even more money for generations. Fans wanting their football club to "do the right thing" and align with their own values comes with that territory.Everyone is free to have thier own barometer, but then inserting an subjective opinion as a stance a club or manager should be taking is a bit of reach.
There are multiple miscarriages of justice both for and against suspects, look what happened to Mendy for example. However as unfortunate as it is at the current time the legal system is all professional institutions can be lead by.
But to continually beat him with this stick smacks of virtue-signaling to me.
But that’s the point the football world as you say are not obliged. He’s not obliged to play either. But there is a reason as to why he has kids with the victim after the boil over. There is a reason why he is a paid professional. And there are second chances in life. I’m sure if you did something horrendous according to your moral compass, situation and were generously remorseful you would want a second chance.Yes - he doesn't have a right to anything, in the sense that football clubs aren't obliged to employ players just because they want to 'work' if the footballing world decided that he had crossed a line and was therefore unemployable he would have no grounds for claiming otherwise.
That’s fine, she has forgiven and chose to move forward in life by double downing. We don’t know the ins or outs of it all. But outside looking in, she has moved on.That's her perogative and says nothing to how you or i should view the man - I'm sure she is not the only rape and domestic abuse victim to forgive their partner. In fact i believe it is sadly common in relationships where there is abuse.
Reducing football clubs to "professional institutions" is undercooking it slightly to be fair. They're unique bodies that thousands of people have followed with a lot of emotion and even more money for generations. Fans wanting their football club to "do the right thing" and align with their own values comes with that territory.
Sure if you want to believe in that film flam … it’s an entertainment business that will happily take every penny off you if they could.Reducing football clubs to "professional institutions" is undercooking it slightly to be fair. They're unique bodies that thousands of people have followed with a lot of emotion and even more money for generations. Fans wanting their football club to "do the right thing" and align with their own values comes with that territory.
It’s no gotcha at all. It’s just a fact as is the fact the case was dropped due to her withdrawing the accusations and new evidence coming to light.
He may still have done what she accused him of. He may not. None of us knows.
But he wasn’t convicted of anything and that’s the barometer of guilt in any decent society, like it or not.
But that’s the point the football world as you say are not obliged. He’s not obliged to play either. But there is a reason as to why he has kids with the victim after the boil over. There is a reason why he is a paid professional. And there are second chances in life. I’m sure if you did something horrendous according to your moral compass, situation and were generously remorseful you would want a second chance.
Yeah I'm feeling positive about de Zebri - definitely one to put in the 'Will unite the fanbase' category.....
They can all have a go, round robin managers, everyone gets a match, the one that concedes the least goals wins
Because it’s a fact of the case. It’s not being brought up or suggested as definitive proof of anything. But if you’re going to condemn Greenwood on the basis of an accusation or evidence that was never tested in a court of law, it’s reasonable that people will offer facts that potentially point in another direction in the interests of balance and fairness.Then why is it being brought up? It bares no relation as to whether or not what happened happened and only serves as misdirection. I mean he was also charged with controlling and coercive behaviour - the subsequent withdrawal of evidence plus whatever new evidence was brought to light (little more than a statement saying the previous was not what it appeared I'd imagine) fits right in to that, no?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.