Is there though? Sticking with Tudor is also a decision being made - regardless of whether fans believe it to be the right decision.Truth is, however, that there is an absolute vacuum of decision making there right now!
Is there though? Sticking with Tudor is also a decision being made - regardless of whether fans believe it to be the right decision.Truth is, however, that there is an absolute vacuum of decision making there right now!
Is there though? Sticking with Tudor is also a decision being made - regardless of whether fans believe it to be the right decision.
![]()
Tottenham Hotspur owner to leave Tudor decision to club executives
Tottenham owner Enic does not plan to step in and take the decision over Igor Tudor's future out of the hands of the club's executive team despite the manager's poor start.www.bbc.com
Good fudge. "I'm leaving the fate of my £3-4bn asset in the hands of two lads who have f**ked up spectacularly on pretty much every decision they've made this season".
Honestly, it's like I've been sucked into some parallel universe.
Completely agree.As a general observation...
Tbh...that is the right approach. If you install the right people in the executive positions you let them captain the ship and make all the big decisions.
That is because you have hired them for their expertise around the industry you operate in. They inherently know a lot more than you do as a money rich owner.
Yes, there can be conversations BUT you've employed these people to guide you. They might as well not be there if you constantly interfere or override them (and the person/persons themselves will feel diminished and probably 'whats the point?)
Agree - But wasn't it said he had to intervene in order to finally get Frank sacked?As a general observation...
Tbh...that is the right approach. If you install the right people in the executive positions you let them captain the ship and make all the big decisions.
That is because you have hired them for their expertise around the industry you operate in. They inherently know a lot more than you do as a money rich owner.
Yes, there can be conversations BUT you've employed these people to guide you. They might as well not be there if you constantly interfere or override them (and the person/persons themselves will feel diminished and probably 'whats the point?)
Would agree wholeheartedly in any semi functional organisation. That is not us. We’re dysfunctional on steroids.As a general observation...
Tbh...that is the right approach. If you install the right people in the executive positions you let them captain the ship and make all the big decisions.
That is because you have hired them for their expertise around the industry you operate in. They inherently know a lot more than you do as a money rich owner.
Yes, there can be conversations BUT you've employed these people to guide you. They might as well not be there if you constantly interfere or override them (and the person/persons themselves will feel diminished and probably 'whats the point?)
We're making a million decisions every hour!Is there though? Sticking with Tudor is also a decision being made - regardless of whether fans believe it to be the right decision.
On the other hand, that's exactly the sort of story you put out when you're getting ready to deny responsibility when it all goes south and point the finger elsewhere.Another story that just seems to be written to fill up a few column inches , the whole point of employing a CEO is that they make the decisions and Vinai is there because of the Lewis family plus the non exec chairman is a director of ENIC.
![]()
Tottenham Hotspur owner to leave Tudor decision to club executives
Tottenham owner Enic does not plan to step in and take the decision over Igor Tudor's future out of the hands of the club's executive team despite the manager's poor start.www.bbc.co.uk
Yes. And they were wrong to do that if 1. What the fudge do they know 2. You undermine and blow up any working relationships you're meant to be developing.Agree - But wasn't it said he had to intervene in order to finally get Frank sacked?
Completely agree.
However it’s pretty obvious they’ve employed the wrong executives in Vinai and Lange.
With the amount of change we've had at C-Suite level any business would need at the very least 12 months to start to see the affect of those changes in alignment, progress, culture etc (more like 24 months tbh)Would agree wholeheartedly in any semi functional organisation. That is not us. We’re dysfunctional on steroids.
I know Vinai and Lange are easy spacegoats but their decision making has proven to be horrendous to the point that, despite spending more than most of the league on transfers, despite having the 6th biggest wage bill, we’re a point above the relegation zone with 8 games to play.
To anyone with eyes and scant knowledge of the game, they’ve hired a guy who has made our plight even worse than it was under Frank.
Sometimes, leadership is stepping in to avoid a doomsday scenario where the club gets relegated, our revenues drop substantially, we lose a bunch of players and a bunch of people around the club lose their jobs as a result.
It would be astounding if Vinai and Lange kept their jobs under any circumstances after his season. Allowing them to keep steering us towards the iceberg unchecked is a dereliction on behalf on the owners IMO.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.