• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

4-2-3-1

Status
Not open for further replies.

ringo

Tim Sherwood
4-2-3-1 seems to be a popular system at the moment in the UK (I'm not sure how many teams play it in the Premier)

I think it is quite a demanding system in terms of having to have specialist/the right type of players in the right positions.
A good #10, which is a difficult position to play. Very fit full backs that can both defend and attack. Two defensive midfielders. Wide players who may be required to come inside, or go outside. A striker that can play up top their own. Attacking players who can play in tight spaces -as 4-2-3-1 is often accompanied by pressing tactics. etc

Setting aside the "it's not the system it's the players/attitude etc that matter" is there a formation that makes it easier to get results with average quality players or less specialised players.

For example, is 4-4-2 with average players, defend resolutely and then hope to get a few breakaways, a better overall strategy with mediocre players? Or 4-5-1 or something else.

Just interested to see what people thought.
 
I've locked this thread because the discussion will be a repeat of what has been discussed in the 4-4-2 thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back