• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ITK Thread

Im sure the goat has been going for years. Let's say he has been going for 10 years and there has been a massive turnover of staff at Spurs since he began, how is he still in the know and have a source. These guys live off there "ItK" badge and are deluded. I'd love to have a beer down the pub with them because their chat would be fudgeing hilarious.

Isn't the goat just a mouthpiece for people to submit ITK to the mods and then have it put out there?
 
I knew sweet FA about Lennon before he came here but I remember hearing at the time that he was always seen as one of those that would definitely make it (at least Prem level) from day one, which made the reported fees of between £500k - £1.5m seem to be pretty baffling to those who knew of him.
 
i think if lennon goes it'd be for about £2,000,000 max.

2M? English winger with pace and a decade of PL experience? never ... consider what we got for Livermore/Hudd/Caulker, all of whom are no where near the quality of Lennon.

especially after he showed he can still improve a top level side (Everton loan example).
 
2M? English winger with pace and a decade of PL experience? never ... consider what we got for Livermore/Hudd/Caulker, all of whom are no where near the quality of Lennon.

especially after he showed he can still improve a top level side (Everton loan example).

I agree, if Townsend is worth 15 mill ( which is the fiqure going around) then Lennon is worth a lot more then 2 mill.
 
I don't think there is much difference between Navas and Lennon.

We need to find a city forum to lay the seed that Lennon would be a good squad signing.
 
I'll go £5m for Lennon.

Whoever signs him knows they will get 2, maybe 3 years of excellent effectiveness out of him before his pace goes. After that it is unknown how good he will be ( personally u rate his passing when cutting inside )
 
I knew sweet FA about Lennon before he came here but I remember hearing at the time that he was always seen as one of those that would definitely make it (at least Prem level) from day one, which made the reported fees of between £500k - £1.5m seem to be pretty baffling to those who knew of him.

it was us doing Leeds a favour. They couldnt offer him a new contract as good as what he had been on (ridsdale era) so would have lost him on a free. We got in quick - as is our way!
 
Isn't the goat just a mouthpiece for people to submit ITK to the mods and then have it put out there?

i just don't understand the logic, i don't recall ever being ITK about Spurs but if i was i wouldn't say diddly squat about it on the internet, a. public knowledge might increase the chance of of being gazumped (although agents behaviour these days makes that far less likely), and b. far more importantly, i might be wrong, on the internet, which is worse than catching aids
 
Who: Jasper
Where: SO
When: 9/7/2015

More from what I was just told, is his [Charlie Austin] agents are pro-active and 'if' there was a remote possibility based upon what QPR want the cost would be in region of 9-10m based upon appearances, success, goals scored etc, that is the package it would rise. From a personal point of view I can't see it but that is my own opinion. Lloriente: We have been speaking to his people, but that is typical Daniel not wanting to miss out if we are left empty handed. They may be Plan *** but not Plan A, B or C.

Who: Jasper
Where:SO
When: 9/7/2015

If Poch had his way Soldado would stay and Ade goes is what I heard. Toby not the DM solution. Chiriches' agents given permission to talk to clubs which they are. Ade won't feature at all, but we knew that.

Id be really happy with Austin

Works much harder than some people may think and he plays much more than just an old number 9
 
i just don't understand the logic, i don't recall ever being ITK about Spurs but if i was i wouldn't say diddly squat about it on the internet, a. public knowledge might increase the chance of of being gazumped (although agents behaviour these days makes that far less likely), and b. far more importantly, i might be wrong, on the internet, which is worse than catching aids

For christ's sake.
This is the remark of a thick 12 year old.
No more please! Report me if you find what I have just said offensive; given the friends I have known who have died of AIDS since the '80s, I think being 'wrong on the internet' is fan-fudging-tastic.
 
Back