Spurs are not the best or biggest team in the world shocker.
We are struggling to finish fourth which suggests that there are at least four clubs in this country alone who are better than us, have better resources, can offer higher wages, have a world ranking higher than ours. We can't win the europa league after years of trying so there are plenty of other clubs - benfica as an example who are better than us are a massive feeder club!
If we try to finish fourth and fail then some of our players are going to want to move on to one of those clubs who are performing at that higher level - Teddy Sheringham did. We see this at a lot of European teams also, ones who are much better than us like Atletico Madrid for example - they constantly sell their best players and constantly replace them and constantly improve.
Our problem is in the players we have been replacing the sold players with, NOT the actual selling of star players. When modric left, have we bought a like for like for him yet? No. When bale left, it was always gonna be difficult to replace him but technically Nacer Chadli was the player who was bought in to fill the gap left by Bales departure and that's a joke! Atletico would never have done that!
Some very good points made but I think our biggest problem is inconsistency at Management level.
We have yet to have a manager who has lasted for four seasons in the Premier League and this, above everything else, is why we have struggled for success.
Explain?
Where is the examples (taking SAF out of the equation as a one off) of 4+ years managerial time leading to significant/sustained success?
As the stats person, how many league/cup trophies in Europe (again minus SAF) in the last 7-10 years have gone to a manager in role for 4 or more years?
There could be another. Imagine if City get thrown out of the CL and the place goes to the 5th placed club, in the year we dropped to 6th.
Some very good points made but I think our biggest problem is inconsistency at Management level.
We have yet to have a manager who has lasted for four seasons in the Premier League and this, above everything else, is why we have struggled for success.
Bill Nicholson (8 trophies won) & Keith Burkinshaw (3 trophies won) both managed the club for more than four seasons each and both were our most successful managers in our history.
What about, as Raziel asked, in the last 7-10 years?
Modern football is vastly different from the era of Nicholson in terms of management overturn. It isn't merely Spurs that are trigger happy letting a coach go. Since Wenger took over at Arsenal, every team in the football league has changed their manager at least once. The climate of football has changed. This is why successful managers in the modern era move on to other clubs rapidly. Arguably Mourinho's biggest challenge since being Porto manager is rebuilding the Chelsea team, something he has never had to do before. Something Wenger has failed to do for a decade now. Longevity, although I wish for it at Spurs, does not indicate success.
Exactly .. even more so, data on modern teams would probably indicate the opposite.
Saw something the other day that said teams fighting relegation do better when they change manager. Not a popular opinion but the facts back it up.
Cardiff, Norwich and Fulham x 2 would be obvious counter arguments. But it depends who you get in. Pulis and Allardyce are good at avoiding the drop