• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

*** Tottenham v Inter OMT ***

I actually agree

Chopping and changing a keeper - the defence are useto one way and then having to autmatically play another

Yep. Especially when their playing styles are so different. Brad is no bad keeper, but he's not suited to the sweeper keeper role at all. Obviously this is far from ideal for us.
 
Haven't you noticed?
Caulker is NEVER there but somehow avoids criticism.

Caulker was very error-prone early on this season. However people forgive him because he's insanely young for a CB and homegrown and has this reputation of being a "ball-playing" CB, though I think he's rather more Dawson/Terry than Rio.
 
Caulker was very error-prone early on this season. However people forgive him because he's insanely young for a CB and homegrown and has this reputation of being a "ball-playing" CB, though I think he's rather more Dawson/Terry than Rio.

I think Dawson is a lot better obviously. I think Dawson would have helped us out in this game to be honest
 
I actually agree

Chopping and changing a keeper - the defence are useto one way and then having to autmatically play another

Lloris is the most important part of a high line. However it's still only papering over the cracks when your back four are all numbskulls and your midfield is hardly helping them with any urgency either.
 
What are you on about ? ??

The high defensive line that brad cant play, defenders not knowing if the keeper is coming or not.

You dont drop your best stiker, for instance, if you need to attack because the second choice forward needs a game. Its fudging gonad*s.
 
I think Dawson is a lot better obviously. I think Dawson would have helped us out in this game to be honest

I mean he's stylistically much more Dawson than Ledley King, though I agree, Dawson is a much better reader of the game atm.
 
Back