• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Conor Gallagher

thfcsteff said:
Agreed. I thought Maddison was exceptional in doing this at Old Trafford, and in having that ability, he ended up creating the patience and tempo around him to create an equalizer. I thought it was a really mature and effective appearance.
Click to expand...
What part did he play in the equaliser? His aura?
 
Lemonade Money said:
What part did he play in the equaliser? His aura?
Click to expand...

For me, his calm on the ball and patience was drawing players to him and leaving space for others as soon as he came on. If I remember correctly, that was one of the more advanced positions Tonali found himself in all match, and at Old Trafford against 10 men I was glad to see it.
 
thfcsteff said:
For me, his calm on the ball and patience was drawing players to him and leaving space for others as soon as he came on. If I remember correctly, that was one of the more advanced positions Tonali found himself in all match, and at Old Trafford against 10 men I was glad to see it.
Click to expand...
Some might argue that we were up against considerably more than 10 men at OT last week…..! It was deffo at least 11 though.
 
Muttley said:
I actually had a look at the heatmaps on here - https://www.whoscored.com/matches/1...-league-2026-2027-manchester-united-tottenham

It is a very "centre to left" heatmap for Conor, balanced by Bergval doing some great work on the right. When you add in Tonali you see a pretty decent coverage from our midfield, and even more confirmation that we did a lot of our best work in that centre left channel as a team.

Then when you add the fact that heatmaps normally represent touches, it also doesn't factor in where players are doing the unselfish running and closing down then it all looks favourable. Gallagher definitely looked all action to me. Tonali also caught my eye. Classy player.

The touches of the ball have a twist though.
Gallagher - 66 in 74 mins
Tonali - 79 in 79 mins
Bergval - 38 in 66 mins

Just shows how the 2 senior players managed to get way more touches than the young gun. That's food for thought for the manager.

I have a feeling RDZ will have some nice problems coming up with these players.
Click to expand...

It's worth noting that in many of the earlier games this season, RDZ had Gallagher filling in at full back spaces when either full back pushed into midfield. So when Porro or Robertson or Gray or Udogie pushed on, someone (often Gallagher, sometimes Tonali) would cover for them.

So it is tricky to look at "average position heatmap" for roles like that. The average makes sense for a winger or striker, but for someone doing (covering) 2 roles it can look odd.

Last night's setup was different of course, we set up with 3 centre backs and with Gray and Robertson wide already, and only one real "midfielder" in Tonali. Those are RDZ's words.
Then in the pocket Maddison with Marmoush left and Kudus right. Those are RDZ's words. With Maddison having licence to drop deep and pick up the ball from the back 3.

So it was kind of 3 CBs, 2 wide, 1 mid, 3 pocket, 1 striker. But I don't think anyone is going to be calling it a 32131 :D



Anyway, my point is, each #10 we have will play a completely different role. Gallagher and Maddison are complete opposites.
 
Addendum: This is probably why Mateus Fernandes is not starting right now, the roles are quite complex and multi faceted and different players will be tasked differently even if they look like they have the same position on paper.
So perhaps MF is finding it complex to get locked in, he might be great at most aspects but keep forgetting to do a couple of things which we don't really notice/know about e.g. tracking players or covering when someone goes forward or whatever.
 
Bullet said:
Addendum: This is probably why Mateus Fernandes is not starting right now, the roles are quite complex and multi faceted and different players will be tasked differently even if they look like they have the same position on paper.
So perhaps MF is finding it complex to get locked in, he might be great at most aspects but keep forgetting to do a couple of things which we don't really notice/know about e.g. tracking players or covering when someone goes forward or whatever.
Click to expand...

This feels like a really fair appraisal of the situation. We forget that it sometimes takes great players time to settle and find their way.
 
Gutter Boy said:
He's a Woolworths Lamela
Click to expand...
Blimey! once you dislike someone you really go in two footed at every opportunity. Shame really because I generally enjoy your posts.

I think you'll be proved wrong with this guy. He's a decent player who has been really valued at the clubs where he has settled. Also he seems to be disliked by his former teammates who kicked him at every opportunity yesterday. For that alone he's a star in my book.
 
Last edited:
Robspur12 said:
Blimey! once you dislike someone you really go in two footed at every opportunity. Shame really because I generally enjoy your posts.

I think you'll be proved wrong with this guy. He's a decent player who has been really valued at the clubs where he has settled. Also he seems to be disliked by his former teammates who kicked him at every opportunity yesterday. For that alone he's a star in my book.
Click to expand...
It was a compliment. I always thought Lamela was a fantastic player

I think Gallagher is perfect for that sort of role yesterday. Coming off the bench when we are ahead and just want to press the brick out of the opponent, to stop them recovering any momentum. I just despair if I ever see him starting. But yesterday was great from him
 
Gutter Boy said:
It was a compliment. I always thought Lamela was a fantastic player

I think Gallagher is perfect for that sort of role yesterday. Coming off the bench when we are ahead and just want to press the brick out of the opponent, to stop them recovering any momentum. I just despair if I ever see him starting. But yesterday was great from him
Click to expand...
You despair with him starting because you went in so early and hard on him being brick that it’s now difficult to admit that you might’ve been wrong. Still at least there are some green shoots appearing with posts like this.
 
Finney Is Back said:
You despair with him starting because you went in so early and hard on him being brick that it’s now difficult to admit that you might’ve been wrong. Still at least there are some green shoots appearing with posts like this.
Click to expand...
No, i just don't think he's very good at kicking the ball. So him in a high possession team is always going to be a struggle. But in the close out the game from a winning position by being disruptive high up the pitch, he's a great sub to bring on. Him for Maddison/Kulu/Simons is the classic old Lamela for Eriksen or Son sub
 
Gutter Boy said:
No, i just don't think he's very good at kicking the ball. So him in a high possession team is always going to be a struggle. But in the close out the game from a winning position by being disruptive high up the pitch, he's a great sub to bring on. Him for Maddison/Kulu/Simons is the classic old Lamela for Eriksen or Son sub
Click to expand...
He certainly has the arts you would expect from someone who has played at Chelsea and atleti.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back