Muttley
Vedran Corluka
Complete true, but the real question is what is our strategy?
Are we Chelsea where we have no loyalty/interest in youth other than a mechanism to monetize? or do we have some real intention to always have a youth player in first team? (which would have dependencies, like x in pipeline, x on fringes)
I think our academy strategy will be latent to our 1st team strategy if that makes sense. I think I'm right in saying that our academy / U21s has paid for itself due to player sales whether that is early, mid or late career. We have a history of selling players out of our academy for decent money. Obviously Harry sits top of that pile and now we see a new phenomenon where a Visokvic can be sold for £50m before he kicks a ball.
For me there are 5 categories.
A) U18s to flood the academy - organic recruitment from young school age all the way up to the Mason Meila's who we pick off from other clubs.
B) 18-21s almost ready for 1st team, including loans but with potential
C) 21-25 year olds who are established elsewhere but need nurturing to greatness
D) 26-29 peak players who should hit the ground running
E) 30 somethings to bring experience and plus short term gaps
I think this year's strategy has moved more to CDE. It felt a little more like ABD previously to be fair. Now we have guys like Richi and Solanke staring down the barrel of their 30th b'days and not having fantastic 1st team contributions. That's the challenge with C.
I'm hoping we eventually get back to the pie chart where D and E are quite minimal and ABC are dominating. However, I'm not so sire with this manager.