I think it’s football that looks nice
But it has no edge, not pace and clearly no threat
People can call out opinion but the data and the goals scored column shows the issues
I like RdZ but I think he is being incredibly stubborn in his team selection to get certain players on the pitch over getting an effective team out there
That’s again, just my opinion
Missed most of second half thankfully but just from memory in that first half Savio and Gray had good chances and they weren't the only two. We could have easily been 2 up at half time and no one would have questioned it whatsoever....
And given we spent 185m on it ............................... jeez
Because we need that quality now, not in 5 years time with no actual guarantee that those players will make it to that level. I absolutely disagree that the midfield we had was good enough, the previous 2 years very much showed that not to be the case.Fernandes looks like he will become a world class midfield maestro but whilst Tonali is clearly an upgrade on the likes of Gallagher plus young Bergvall and Sarr I still cannot fathom the logic in splashing out a club record fee on him when we already had reasonable options in that department.
Not when we’re so desperately lacking at CF position and especially when it’s clear from RDZ’s recent comments that he’s known for a while that Richarlison wanted out plus Solanke is well short of match sharpness.
Do you think we could have spent 80 on Fernandes and 100 (or whatever) on a striker maybe? Improve midfield and goal scoring.Because we need that quality now, not in 5 years time with no actual guarantee that those players will make it to that level. I absolutely disagree that the midfield we had was good enough, the previous 2 years very much showed that not to be the case.
I don't think the issue is Tonali's ability, hes actually played reasonably well. It's down to how we've used him and set up the rest of the midfield. RDZ I have to say has gotten that wrong imo. It might be necessitated from his POV by injuries but the balances have been wrong.
I think we could have yes just done Fernandes and paired him with Bentancur but then the issue is the depth. We would have literally two starting quality CMs. What if one of them were injured as was the case at the begining of the season? Then you're in a situation where Bergvall or Gallagher are starting as the other option.Do you think we could have spent 80 on Fernandes 100 (or whatever) on a striker maybe? Improve midfield and goal scoring.
Fernandes and Bentancur look taylor made for each other. With no Europe, they could have been supported by Gray, Bergval and Gallagher. Or we add Paulinha back in for low money.
They’ve bodged the window up - no doubt about it.
I mentioned Paulinha as he could have been an option to add at low cost if we wanted backup to Bentancur/Fernandes. Nothing to do with goal scoring.I think we could have yes just done Fernandes and paired him with Bentancur but then the issue is the depth. We would have literally two starting quality CMs. What if one of them were injured as was the case at the begining of the season? Then you're in a situation where Bergvall or Gallagher are starting as the other option.
The problem for me is not buying Tonali, it's playing Tonali and Bentancur as a double pivot and Fernandes as a 10. It should be Tonali or Bentancur alongside Fernandes and a 10. If course we'd had some injury issues in the 19 so that would be up for grabs but then you could try Gallagher/Bergvall/Marmoush/Kudus etc there. None are ideal but neither is Fernandes. Id rather fudge up one position then fudge up all 3 midfield roles which is what RDZ has sadly been doing so far.
Re Palhinha I don't understand why he's now seen as a solution to our goal scoring and creating problems? If he were playing he would exacerbate these issues.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.