I mean away for the finances its been handled horrendously but yehWell done to the club. Finally putting the football side of things and squad harmony over money.
So this is what squad harmony looks like.Well done to the club. Finally putting the football side of things and squad harmony over money.
The question for me is whether or not Richarlison would've disrupted training. Often players that are on the periphery and want out can do this and it does not benefit the team. IMO the old Spurs would've had asset value as the first priority and put Richi in the squad. I'm pleased to see that we have instead backed the manager.I mean away for the finances its been handled horrendously but yeh
Depending on what you believe the reason its being dragged out in the press is because we blocked a cheaper deal for us, better deal for him to Turkey, so exactly the opposite of what you are saying, neither of us know BTW, I am just saying.The question for me is whether or not Richarlison would've disrupted training. Often players that are on the periphery and want out can do this and it does not benefit the team. IMO the old Spurs would've had asset value as the first priority and put Richi in the squad. I'm pleased to see that we have instead backed the manager.
I have no idea what transfer move (if any) either we or he blocked but for any transfer to happen the buying club have to agree a fee with teh selling club. If Richarlison really wanted to move to Turkey then he could've taken a smaller wage to allow them to pay a bigger transfer fee to Spurs and get a deal agreed.Depending on what you believe the reason its being dragged out in the press is because we blocked a cheaper deal for us, better deal for him to Turkey, so exactly the opposite of what you are saying, neither of us know BTW, I am just saying.
The who thing being played out how it is hardly makes us or him look great in equal measures
I have no idea what transfer move (if any) either we or he blocked but for any transfer to happen the buying club have to agree a fee with teh selling club. If Richarlison really wanted to move to Turkey then he could've taken a smaller wage to allow them to pay a bigger transfer fee to Spurs and get a deal agreed.
I'm just talking about him being left out of the squad for the first half of this season. I ask myself why would the manager have left him out of the squad? The only reason I can come up with is that he thinks he is a disruptive influence, nothing else makes sense to me. I therefore see this as the manager being backed. And I don't think that would've happened previously.
To play devil's advocate.....he stated he was looking for a new opportunity but on his terms. That could have well looked like happening. Until it didn't. So if he's not happy, he's remains at the club he's contracted with.Yep, how any Spurs fan can side with Richi here is beyond me.
Has he actually apologised for his social media outburst?
Quite honestly, let him go to his lawyers. they will tell him he has no case anyway. Let him go to his trade union. He'll get the same message there as well.
Richi needs to hold himself accountable for the predicament he finds himself in. He bit the hand that feeds him and is paying the price. He can pay us £10m himself and buy out his contract. Why should we lose out?
To play devil's advocate.....he stated he was looking for a new opportunity but on his terms. That could have well looked like happening. Until it didn't. So if he's not happy, he's remains at the club he's contracted with.
But then the club aren't happy and the manager ain't happy, basically because they aren't getting what they want. Just like Richie wasn't happy because he wasn't getting what he wanted.
Laws and rules rule this situation, not (their) emotions. That's why (as I said the other day) having someone that can slip into cool head rational thinking mode asap is essential.
Let's all hope he can get a move to Brazil (assuming that's what he wants)
He clearly didn't care about the club when he sold his soul on social media. You reap what you sow.
What's clear is currently the situation benefits neither player, or us. A lot of the rest seems like conjecture as it usually is.
De Zerbi's made comments earlier in the summer that suggested Richarlison was flip-flopping between wanting to stay and wanting to go.Both have a right to stand their ground based on their contracts and the player has probably an upper hand because of pure choice alone of where he wishes to be.
What is clear is that if the club were told he wanted to leave early on that it being dragged out looks poor. You would not have taken him on a pre season trip and played the first game.
I don't buy the full rhetoric on everyone being a bad egg, everyone said it all summer about players we were looking to offload, like zombies. Was said about Spence, Vusko, Bergvall and others...........
Of course but equally if we were acting like said we would have just kissed him off.
And all that is fine, but the episode in itself is disruptive and massively distracting, its likely to consume the weekends fixture for us which is not good considering we need a win badly
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.