• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Richarlison

I think it shows how much success changes a fanbase. Before Champions League became a regular fixture for Spurs, we used to thank a player for their services, as long as they didn't act like dingdongs. For all his flaws, Richarlison's commitment was never in doubt. I believe (but it's just my opinion), it makes more sense to discuss a player's pros and cons when he's at the club.

In this instance, he obviously wanted to leave; someone gave us a good a price for him. Everybody should be happy.

It's the cultural change that is the most interesting with the new manager. It starts last season where Roberto tells these players that he will help them move on if they give 100% for him and help him to get us to stay up. We then shift to the summer and Roberto and the club are true to their word and we've seen an exodus of some decent players.

I quite like the way that Roberto is making it about himself rather than the players. He always reminds the outside world that he loves these players like Richi and he is refreshingly honest about their desire to leave. It is not personal and it all feels like a non-emotional conversation that is taking place to establish a quid-pro-quo with club and player. As much as some fans will hate this, this culture is also shared by Johan Lange who then works with the players and agents to get them moved on quickly, whilst we secure replacements.

What I would ask is that what happens when a relatively new players who is holding a first team shirt gets loose in the saddle? Does Roberto afford them the same conditions and let them leave?
 
Richy will be the fourth in a row, no? Albeit Johnson left in the winter window.

My take on this is to just focus on us signing our new top scorers, and get behind Dom who can contribute massively.

Johnson is a great example of a player not to use in this argument. Moved to Palace and couldn't register goals. Already been moved on after 6 months.

Also interested to know what the Everton fans think about Richi heading back there.
 
It's the cultural change that is the most interesting with the new manager. It starts last season where Roberto tells these players that he will help them move on if they give 100% for him and help him to get us to stay up. We then shift to the summer and Roberto and the club are true to their word and we've seen an exodus of some decent players.

I quite like the way that Roberto is making it about himself rather than the players. He always reminds the outside world that he loves these players like Richi and he is refreshingly honest about their desire to leave. It is not personal and it all feels like a non-emotional conversation that is taking place to establish a quid-pro-quo with club and player. As much as some fans will hate this, this culture is also shared by Johan Lange who then works with the players and agents to get them moved on quickly, whilst we secure replacements.

What I would ask is that what happens when a relatively new players who is holding a first team shirt gets loose in the saddle? Does Roberto afford them the same conditions and let them leave?
I think to have FULL buy-in and a cohesive direction of travel across the group, it's an essential step. As you say, doesn't have to be emotional. Respectful, absolutely. Logical, 100%.

Not sure on an answer to your last paragraph?
 
My take on this is to just focus on us signing our new top scorers, and get behind Dom who can contribute massively.

Johnson is a great example of a player not to use in this argument. Moved to Palace and couldn't register goals. Already been moved on after 6 months.

Also interested to know what the Everton fans think about Richi heading back there.
Don’t disagree. I was just correcting. We will have sold our last 4 top scorers the following season (assuming Richy goes, which I’m fine with)
 
There can be good reasons to selling the top scorers, but given our record over these seasons it might not be the best plan to sell before you have a proven replacement (proven in the sense of scoring goals for us, not his previous club).
 
Everton are apparently about to sign Balogan, so perhaps we’ll be keeping Richarlison after all…

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Different circumstances. Son was approaching the end and Johnson didn’t contribute enough in terms of all round play. We should have replaced Johnson’s goals though I’ll say that.
This wasnt anything to do with Johnson, it was meant to be:

2024 - sold Kane (previous season top scorer)
2025 - sold Son (previous season top scorer)
2026 - sell Richy (previous season top scorer)
 
I hear you. I often feel that some of these conversations lose their objectivity. It's not just a dialogue with some differing opinions with a healthy respect for the the other persons views. It becomes a point scoring exercise and there have been occasions where I've had to remind people that they're playing the man, not the ball. Sometimes we probably need reminding that we're all supporting the same team.

Honestly mate, I think sometimes we all need reminding that we ALL engage in this from time to time.
 
Back