• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Levy's Plan

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

The above for me clears Levy. Spurs made the move. Mane wanted Liverpool.
 
So it was their chairman and not levy…



Bruno Fernandes stayed at Sporting Lisbon despite interest from Premier League clubs (Picture: Getty)
Sporting Lisbon’s president Frederico Varandas has revealed that Tottenham’s offer for Bruno Fernandes was rejected over doubts about the club’s potential to win major trophies.


The 25-year-old midfielder was linked with a host of top clubs during the summer following an exceptional 2018-19 campaign but surprisingly ended up staying with Sporting.

Tottenham seemed particularly interested in luring Fernandes away from the Portuguese capital after submitting an offer worth a potential €65m, however, Sporting rejected their approach.


Varandas has since confirmed that Sporting turned down Spurs’ offer as they were unconvinced the club could meet clauses related to winning the Premier League and Champions League.



In an official statement posted to the club’s website, Varandas said: ‘We have managed to hold on to our highest-value player, Bruno Fernandes, and have been able to provide balance and better solutions.

‘We think this group is more competitive and has more quality than last season. It was ‘impossible’ to retain Bruno Fernandes, but we did it.

‘We prepared for his sale by putting a fair price on him, and we had bids, but the only serious offer was from Tottenham and that was €45 million plus another €20m in bonuses for winning the Premier League and the Champions League.

‘Those are difficult objectives, so we chose not to accept. Bruno Fernandes proved to be not only a great player but a great professional and captain. The dignity and responsibility that he has always shown is exemplary.


‘The day I turned down Tottenham’s proposal, I came to the training ground and spoke to him. I told him why I declined the offer and why he would stay here beyond the end of the market and he understood perfectly.

‘In addition, he also understood that the bid they offered us was not fair. He’s not leaving, he’s a Sporting player. Many European clubs want him and we know this is something we will always have to deal with.’
Why do we have to always try to deflect from Mr Teflon. The above is from the official statement released by Sporting. We simply didn't make them a financial offer that they felt was appropriate, 6 months later Manchester United did.
 
Why do we have to always try to deflect from Mr Teflon. The above is from the official statement released by Sporting. We simply didn't make them a financial offer that they felt was appropriate, 6 months later Manchester United did.
I’m just literally saying what is said in the video
 
  • Like
Reactions: DTA
Who would know the details of the transfer negotiation, the chairman doing the deal or the player who only hears if its been accepted or rejected?

None of this is new. The reasons for why that transfer didn't happen have been known for years.
And who may have an agenda or want to put a positive spin on rejecting a bid.

Your Levy hate has your head spun round.

And it’s people like you that lead this club to brink of disaster with your “Levy out” bullşhit when he was probably the only one holding this club together.

Now we coffe and cake corner agent VV making the decision along with a couple of nepos and Fùnking Lange.

Ps if you don’t know the coffee and cake corner reference then read the latest athletic article it is some fûcking cringe worthy brick
 
As Fernandes didn’t help utd win either the PL or CL maybe we were right to not go throwing money around on him.
There is no doubt he's a talented player, but he's not the right player for us.
It's just a pity we wasted the money we were to spend on him.

I don’t regret not signing him at all, luxury player who does nowhere near enough defensively.
 
And who may have an agenda or want to put a positive spin on rejecting a bid.

Your Levy hate has your head spun round.

And it’s people like you that lead this club to brink of disaster with your “Levy out” bullşhit when he was probably the only one holding this club together.

Now we coffe and cake corner agent VV making the decision along with a couple of nepos and Fùnking Lange.

Ps if you don’t know the coffee and cake corner reference then read the latest athletic article it is some fûcking cringe worthy brick
The interesting thing is I didn't put any spin on it either way. I didn't criticise Levy. I simply laid out the facts. We did not make Sporting a financial offer that they were willing to accept.

This has been known for 5 or 6 years at this point. You are so determined to defend Levy from what you perceived as a slight that you are trying to defend him from an attack that doesn't even exist.

If you think the problems this club have suffered from specifically this season but also the 4 seasons leading up to this one occured purely because Levy was no longer in charge from September the 1st 2025 than my friend I don't think you actually understand how complex organisations work and instead you are just so in awe of Levy you literally can't see the wood for the trees.

In simple terms the club's current standing didn't just happen this season it's been a slow and gradual degradation of it's playing staff. Season after season, poor decisions made and after poor decisions. Unlike you I don't sperate Levy from ENIC they are one and the same and together part of the bigger problem. But you keep thinking Levy was some hero despite his decisions directly being the cause of why we are where are.
 
As Fernandes didn’t help utd win either the PL or CL maybe we were right to not go throwing money around on him.
There is no doubt he's a talented player, but he's not the right player for us.
It's just a pity we wasted the money we were to spend on him.
Fernandes would have been the right player for us though. He was the ideal Eriksen replacement. A high volume chance creator. Yes he's very much a Hollywood passer but what we've lacked since Eriksen left was someone genuinely capable of creating from little or nothing, something Fernandes can do.

Regarding his stint at United you have to remember we were actually the better side at the time, consistently finishing higher in the table. It's not being able to complete signings like Fernandes that flipped things and the likes of United, Arsenal and Chelsea to overtake us. So buying him would have likely made all the difference for us in our context, much more so than GLC did by comparison. Buying quality players is what keeps the squad quality, buying poorer players consistently over time gets you from where we were to where we are now.
 
Who would know the details of the transfer negotiation, the chairman doing the deal or the player who only hears if its been accepted or rejected?

None of this is new. The reasons for why that transfer didn't happen have been known for years.
Honestly
I don’t trust any chairman who talks publicly on transfers. They only ever talk from their perspective because it’s how they protect themselves
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Predicted this some pages back when he was sacked, or in a different thread.

What happened? Levy as a minority shareholder started to look at ways to cash out, and didn't consult with the Lewis', he tried to push a deal through so he could exit with the maximum return for his shares. This annoyed the majority shareholders who lost some good faith, and then invested in the club, so diluting Levy's shareholding. Maybe Levy will sell his stake to the Lewis' now, close off any lingering legal disputes and make for a clean-ish exit. He won't get nearly as much as if he had orchestrated a sale of Spurs, but he won't be on the doll! As a minority shareholder your shares are worth less normally.
 
"Daniel Levy has missed a deadline"

Does any outsider actually know how the many faces of ENIC works, D Levy and certain members of his family are potential beneficiaries of a discretionary trust which ultimately own 29.88% of the share capital of ENIC Sports and Development Holdings Limited which in turn owns 100% of ENIC Sports Inc.
It is ENIC Sports Inc that are subscribing to the additional shares in Tottenham Hotspur so where exactly does their money come from, to complicate matters further when Charrington joined the board he was described by the club as a director of ENIC , who knows which ENIC.

One bonus it must be a record number of days since any takeover talk. :)
 
Predicted this some pages back when he was sacked, or in a different thread.

What happened? Levy as a minority shareholder started to look at ways to cash out, and didn't consult with the Lewis', he tried to push a deal through so he could exit with the maximum return for his shares. This annoyed the majority shareholders who lost some good faith, and then invested in the club, so diluting Levy's shareholding. Maybe Levy will sell his stake to the Lewis' now, close off any lingering legal disputes and make for a clean-ish exit. He won't get nearly as much as if he had orchestrated a sale of Spurs, but he won't be on the doll! As a minority shareholder your shares are worth less normally.
I'm not quite sure what your saying.
He can sell his shares to whomever he wants. If someone came in at the price he wanted...the deal gets done.

Secondly, The amounts the Lewis's have put in will dilute his holding if they have converted that injection into stock. But the amount they put in is not going to shift his % downwards by much. Furthermore he potentially gets something for that injection. Obviously the 'investment' is intended to make the business better...so it becomes more valuable...so your share (even if reduced slightly) becomes more valuable.

What I guess Levy is weighing up....is he could match their investment to hold his share % as it is BUT as he has no control or active management of the club anymore will be committing £200-300m to an ongoing project that he might simply think 'is being run by idiots' ...so won't make that bet.
 
Back