• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

FIFA: Destroying Football Since 1904

So Infantino can build his football federation around those two zones. Good luck.
It’s pretty much worked for him so far tbf.. I’m sure everyone’s seen the documentary on FIFA now from a few years ago, the one country one vote system means he can “grow the game” ($$$$$$) in those far out places and he gets ($$) their votes. He’s very popular in the footballing backwaters of which there are literally 100+ countries, enough to keep him in power, it’s his MO.

The only way I see anything changing is if UEFA really carry out their threats, as world cups without European teams are worthless, as arrogant as it sounds.
 
It’s pretty much worked for him so far tbf.. I’m sure everyone’s seen the documentary on FIFA now from a few years ago, the one country one vote system means he can “grow the game” ($$$$$$) in those far out places and he gets ($$) their votes. He’s very popular in the footballing backwaters of which there are literally 100+ countries, enough to keep him in power, it’s his MO.

The only way I see anything changing is if UEFA really carry out their threats, as world cups without European teams are worthless, as arrogant as it sounds.
That's what I'm saying....other associations can walk away. And he can be left with Africa and the Middle East.
 
It’s pretty much worked for him so far tbf.. I’m sure everyone’s seen the documentary on FIFA now from a few years ago, the one country one vote system means he can “grow the game” ($$$$$$) in those far out places and he gets ($$) their votes. He’s very popular in the footballing backwaters of which there are literally 100+ countries, enough to keep him in power, it’s his MO.

The only way I see anything changing is if UEFA really carry out their threats, as world cups without European teams are worthless, as arrogant as it sounds.

Why is everywhere outside of Europe and South America automatically a “footballing backwater?”
 
No wonder Infantino got along so well with Trump #BirdsOfAFeather

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
UEFA need to keep the ball rolling, and find more stuff on Infantino that will further hurt his position. The only way to get him out, is that there is so much dirt floating around that he is forced to resign. If he manages to navigate through this until the fifa Congress in November, he's safe. There is no other candidate, and it will be almost impossible to find a "reform" candidate that will get the votes needed.
Infantino needs to be caught up in so much dirt that he's forced to resign. With his ego, acting like a state leader, We're nowhere near that level yet.
 
How many people do you think are going to watch the World Cup without European and South American teams? They are the big ticket games for TV. Broadcasting and sponsorship bring in the money.
That was exactly my point at the start of this conversation.

The point I was then making with my 'Middle East' response was they can fill in any hole with money.
 
That was exactly my point at the start of this conversation.

The point I was then making with my 'Middle East' response was they can fill in any hole with money.

Sorry if I missed your point, I don't believe FIFA (Infantino) are concerned with previous history, trophies or domestics leagues of the established leading teams. His sole interest is in the power and influence which he has and uses the dream of making the game available to a wider circle by buying votes with promises of investment from member nation where there are limited resources to keep his position.
I don't know how the money he promises will be spent as there appears to be litle transparency on proposals or what the cost of building the infrastructure of making projects happen but 40m a member doesn't seem a lot to me for such works.
 
Back