VAR: Sponsored by Chelsea

[SteveAWOL]

Same old VARsenal

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Baleforce]

thats what happens when you publicly call out the officiating

we should do it

 

[K.D.D.D.D.Soc]

Bet the boys at Stokley Park were disappointed the technology confirmed the ball was over the line, they could have found or invented a reason to disallow the follow for a foul/offside/incident a couple of minutes earlier.

 

[SteveAWOL]

Yet another VARsical decision which is far from clear and obvious and subject to whichever frame they decide to freeze

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[WillWeEverBeGoodAgain]

Surely this thread should be called VAR Sponsored by Arsenal

 

[K.D.D.D.D.Soc]

Yet another VARsical decision which is far from clear and obvious and subject to whichever frame they decide to freeze

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Its probably technically correct but in my belief not in the spirit of the original law. I've not seen this incident but thought VAR checked all goals for offside whether it was clear and obvious.

 

[stratnumberone]

Its probably technically correct but in my belief not in the spirit of the original law. I've not seen this incident but thought VAR checked all goals for offside whether it was clear and obvious.

Where’s the 5cm tolerance that got wheeled out when Liverpool had a goal questioned?

 

[hash browns and onions]

Sherwood on Refwatch said that Rohl was correct to not get a red because where else was his foot supposed to go in his follow through. Though I agree with him, where was this chat on the (at least) two occasions Romero has done the same and been sent off?

 

[Baleforce]

Sherwood on Refwatch said that Rohl was correct to not get a red because where else was his foot supposed to go in his follow through. Though I agree with him, where was this chat on the (at least) two occasions Romero has done the same and been sent off?

If you can’t follow through safely you shouldn’t be doing it.

Studs + Ankle = Red

 

[Robbo]

If you can’t follow through safely you shouldn’t be doing it.

Studs + Ankle = Red

Yep. Now just apply this principle fairly and consistently.