Think that’s more to do with RDZ than Romero tbf7 PTS from 9 without him ... Defence looks in control. Danso looks more calming too VDV
Think that’s more to do with RDZ than Romero tbf
Well...it's certainly nothing to do with Romero we can safely say thatThink that’s more to do with RDZ than Romero tbf
It was good old Ollie as well - Romero's nemesis.Romero would’ve got a straight red from the ref had he made the foul on Doku that Keane did for Evefton against City. Had the ref not red carded him then VAR would’ve sent him to the monitor.
That’s fair but when has he not been a bit of a liability under whoever has been in charge. Don’t doubt his ability but his mentality is very questionable. I completely get his frustrations and social media posts that dog the club out, after all he’s not said anything that most disagree with.Think that’s more to do with RDZ than Romero tbf
That’s fair but when has he not been a bit of a liability under whoever has been in charge. Don’t doubt his ability but his mentality is very questionable. I completely get his frustrations and social media posts that dog the club out, after all he’s not said anything that most disagree with.
However his on the field antics don’t always fill me with confidence, he is rash and doesn’t always focus. His ability however is not in question here. I just think he’s a bit decisive and doesn’t lead by example all the time. Danso is so much more composed and is performing better on the pitch.
I agree but when you way it up you have one player in Danso who is reliable, rarely messes up and is limited in his ability outside of being a good defender. On the other hand you have an elite defender who is liable to cost you a goal and equally get sent off, or set up or score a goal. Risk over reward.Danso plays within his limitations, Romero can/will do anything.
In a relegation battle when you are asking your defenders to stay compact, put their bodies on the line, mop up every ball in the air or second ball, Danso is a better fit (and it's showing)
In a team playing its best, dominating games and asking the defenders to contribute to the attack/passing, Romero is a step above.
Romero was absolute quality and dependable under Ange. He needs a strong figure to keep him in check…like, say, RDZ.I agree but when you way it up you have one player in Danso who is reliable, rarely messes up and is limited in his ability outside of being a good defender. On the other hand you have an elite defender who is liable to cost you a goal and equally get sent off, or set up or score a goal. Risk over reward.
I’d argue why take the risk? He breaks up the relationship with VDV by either being injured or being suspended. Danso is competent and reliable. But yes of course he will need competition.
Furthermore I think Romero is quite a decisive character and doesn’t set the right tone for captain, especially when he’s injured one week and then on a flight to play a friendly for Argentina.
We can get good money for him and is replaceable.
Keep Romero, VDV and that Croatian kid. We have our CBS for the next 5-10 years. Next question
That just tells me that he chooses when to play and when not to. He got 3 red cards playing under Ange.Romero was absolute quality and dependable under Ange. He needs a strong figure to keep him in check…like, say, RDZ.
However, if the Senesi rumors are to be believed, then it would make sense to move him on at his prime age and market value. 60mil, nothing less.
I agree with a lot of that, and maybe I should have been more specific. He was dependable under Ange after the red card against Cheat$ki.That just tells me that he chooses when to play and when not to. He got 3 red cards playing under Ange.
I just think he’s an overrated asset that will probably excel under Simeone playing in Spain under a legend from Argentina. Then people will say that we should never have let him go etc … but I will say that it was completely understandable and obvious.
We need to keep our best players and Cristian is one of them imo, so is VDV. The CB position is the last place we need improvements on. Vuksovic can replace him down the line, that is why I said 5-10 years. Micky is still young, just turned 25. Dragusin is 24 and if he ups his game a bit and still wants to stay with us, considering his low game time, then we are set. Mind you we still have Philips, 20 yo, that could become a good player too.Romero is 28 already. Will all 3 still be with us in 5-10 years time? Will they even be in this country?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.