El Dante
Paul Walsh
He's had one injury that kept him out for several weeks last year, beyond that I don't think he's missed more than 1-2 games through injury.
Neither had Solanke had he before joining us?
He's had one injury that kept him out for several weeks last year, beyond that I don't think he's missed more than 1-2 games through injury.
He's had one injury that kept him out for several weeks last year, beyond that I don't think he's missed more than 1-2 games through injury.
Or MuaniNeither had Solanke had he before joining us?
You're right, we should never buy another player because they are bound to get injured once we sign them.Neither had Solanke had he before joining us?
You're right, we should never buy another player because they are bound to get injured once we sign them.
Lol. Basically everyone wantsperfectcompetent players whoneverdon’t constantly make the same mistakes, andalwayswin more games than they lose.
Aren't we doing that tbf? Vuskovic/VDV/Gray/Odobert/Xavi Simons/Odobert/Tel/BergvallIMO, we have to get back to buying players like Eze from QPR (has to decide between Crystal Palace or us), rather than trying to buy Eze from Crystal Palace (has to decide between Arsenal and us - yes I know he's a goon, but they are a better prospect than us for anyone).
There is a reason no one else was in for our ready made PL buys (Solanke, Maddison, Kudus, Bissouma, etc.). They are decent, but not top tier.
All our best buys (Dele, Bale, Modric, Son, etc.) would not have signed for us if they had gone to another PL side first.
Yep, I'd like us to do it with all our buys.Aren't we doing that tbf? Vuskovic/VDV/Gray/Odobert/Xavi Simons/Odobert/Tel/Bergvall
We've invested a lot in younger players for not insignificant fees - whether they all come good or not is another question. The ones you mention other than Son to some extent hit the ground running more than most of the recent crop, but we are certainly shopping in that market....
In which case there can be no moaning about slumps and poor periods. Having a young squad will almost certainly mean a longer 'journey' to sustained good results. As opposed to buying ready made.Yep, I'd like us to do it with all our buys.
Short term yes, but long term these young buys will become the senior players, and so on. With a steady conveyor belt, the squad would have a mix of youth and experience.In which case there can be no moaning about slumps and poor periods. Having a young squad will almost certainly mean a longer 'journey' to sustained good results. As opposed to buying ready made.
The difference is you can buy a Maddison or Solanke who are 7.5/10 players. Or you can buy a young 6/10 who might become a 9/10. We as fans and the board have to let a manager move the squad from 6 to 9. But it takes a special manager.
FWIW - I still think there is a balance to be struck.
I said at the start of the season we could have brought in Henderson. I'm sure many scoffed. He's a fantastic leader and someone who commands respect from referees etc. He wouldn't have needed to play that much to have an influence on the younger players. It wasn't a signing based on ability, but would have been exactly what we needed out on the pitch.
Edit: Also - there are sometimes nuggets that fit the young mantra but also semi proven. Mainoo being one. We should be all over that.
We need experienced heads to help those youngsters develop and guide them through games. Think we have enough youngsters at the moment between what's at the club and those out on loan. That's not to say we shouldn't be looking to pick up one or two youngsters at a good price each window.Yep, I'd like us to do it with all our buys.
Twitter is saying Lange is interested in de Cat
Whilst this would be a good surname for jokes and headlines, he is only 17 and has made 18 appearances in the Jupiler league
![]()
Nathan De Cat - Player profile 25/26
Nathan De Cat, 17, from Belgium ➤ RSC Anderlecht, since 2025 ➤ Central Midfield ➤ Market value: €17.00m ➤ * 19/07/2008 in Vilvoorde, Belgiumwww.transfermarkt.com
He will probably become a really good player in the next few years and might even be good enough for a top PL side in 5 years' time, but he is nowhere near good enough for right now.
Think back to the last game, Forest's Sangare and Anderson (and MGW) would snap him in half and eat him for breakfast.
Why are you called Bullet? And why the egg head?Twitter is saying Lange is interested in de Cat
Whilst this would be a good surname for jokes and headlines, he is only 17 and has made 18 appearances in the Jupiler league
![]()
Nathan De Cat - Player profile 25/26
Nathan De Cat, 17, from Belgium ➤ RSC Anderlecht, since 2025 ➤ Central Midfield ➤ Market value: €17.00m ➤ * 19/07/2008 in Vilvoorde, Belgiumwww.transfermarkt.com
He will probably become a really good player in the next few years and might even be good enough for a top PL side in 5 years' time, but he is nowhere near good enough for right now.
Think back to the last game, Forest's Sangare and Anderson (and MGW) would snap him in half and eat him for breakfast.
When I signed up I was listening to Bullet in the Head by RATM and googled 'Avatar image' and there was the eggy baby and I thought, that'll do.Why are you called Bullet? And why the egg head?
Fully agreement. If another Vuskovic, Bergvall type deal is possible make it happen even if we also need some here and now solutions.So it's only really a problem if he is bought as a mainstay 25/26 season player. However, we all know clubs don't buy 17 year olds to be that. I'd always welcome my club speculating on these youngsters.
What we really need for the first team is a Wharton, Anderson or (Joao) Gomes level player. Not sure Gomes is quite hitting the heights this season but that might be more down to the bigger Wolves issues. Most likely, all three would become our senior midfielder if they joined.
I will raise my hand and say I don't want Semenyo at Spurs.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.