I think in fairness to Frank, a point I heard earlier today around the players being told that for 2 years, no matter what, we never stop. We attack, we play, we’re brave etc. And then suddenly, they have a whole different idea. It’s defensive solidity, it’s breaking at the right times, it’s crosses above all else. It’s pressing at certain moments, tracking at others. It’s basically a whole new idea in so many respects. That must be hard on the players, and must be harder for Frank because the previous idea was so extreme that to unwind it and get them around to his way was going to be harder. So I have a lot of sympathy for that and I think a big reason for the results, performances and seeming tension is that sort of dynamic.
That said, I thought the promise was Frank was about getting the best out of what he has. He was flexible, pragmatic, and would see that we had a talented squad that just needed a more balanced approach to not being so open and we’d do a lot better this season. But it hasn’t really worked out like that. It turns out Frank is a coach who needs time to get his own ideas across. So then we have to question whether this is ultimately the vision we want to build towards. And that’s why when he’s asked about how to break down low blocks he talks about crosses…it concerns me.
People point to Arteta getting 6 years but there was always a greater vision there. He had other coaches saying he was doing interesting and unique things tactically. You could see why it was worth investing the time. While I sympathise with Frank needing time to unwind the previous culture, I’m not yet convinced that his vision is one worth investing in. At its best, we’ll attack and defend at the right times and make other teams look naive. But are we going to get there? Will the players want to get there? Is this vision worth investing in long term, and requiring another transitional season to get right? Is anyone seriously convinced that it is?