glorygloryeze
Nayim
joy? its football
Ardilles had a much better squad than Ange, Ossie was a fudging idiot
the PL is a lot weaker than it was last season, look at the table, look at the results, the performances
What??? Now i KNOW you're drunk!!
joy? its football
Ardilles had a much better squad than Ange, Ossie was a fudging idiot
the PL is a lot weaker than it was last season, look at the table, look at the results, the performances
They didThey got lucky??
Ok i'm out
Stop! Hammer time, I see plenty of posters praising us for making the same mistakes over and over again because we were "brave".Seriously there are some trolls in here.
Comparing anges results to ardiles? Ok compare them. After 11 games. Show us the results.
The teams we've played so far this season, are somehow worse than they were last season? Because...
If you don't think you are troll. Then maybe have a moment of introspection and rethink why you support this club. (Not saying you shouldn't, just thst it might not be bringing you joy).
Ardiles started 94/95 well but his decline had nothing to do with injuries. It was the personnel he chose at the back. Walker, Kerslake, Edinburgh, Judas and Calderwood in CM were ever presents and once teams figured us out, those 6 got exploited. Watch Nethercott against Southampton. Watch the 2-5 Emirates Marketing Project game. Nothing to do with injuries. Sheringham got injured the season before IIRC but played all games under Ossie in 94/95.Nonsense. This is what really causes problems on a forum.
1. Ardiles football was great before key injuries set in, e.g. Teddy Sheringham and one of our defenders (i think Mabutt IIRC)
2. Once those injuries came Ardiles showed he couldn't adjust our tactics to being more pragmatic
3. We have just played a very average Chelsea side who have been on a loooong decline - check how many league games the've won in the last 18 months. We have given them that win on a plate due to naivety and some recklessness.
4. If we lose like this on the weekend away to Wolves will you be a similarly gushing?
Just understand that for the praise we can give for having a go, we can also critique what went wrong without having to be labelled as 'trolls' FFS!
We were playing to score a goalWe were down to 9. No matter how we played, we’d likely have lost.
I actually thought at 1-1 that you’d just never know. Maybe we’d nick one and the roof would come off the place. At 2-1, I still thought we’d have a chance of a draw.
The tactics didn’t cost us. It was all on the red cards which comes down to discipline. That’s where you can maybe look at the manager because there have been a couple of signs this season that we’re a little suspect on that score.
What??? Now i KNOW you're drunk!!
They did
they were born offside
a good team would have dealt with that high line and smashed us
they didn’t because they are toilet
Repeating the same thing that’s failing is justo daft imo
We were playing to score a goal
we weren’t werent okaying to avoid defeat
everyone I spoke to leaving that ground tonight left with a sense of pride
it was two players letting their heads go that hurt is as you say
They Brought in a DM against 9 men to see it out….
Did Popescu play under Ossie. If he did, it was a game or two at most. Erik the Viking was finished by the time Klinsmann came in…Walker was the keeper. Carr didn’t play under Ossie or, if he did, it was friendlies and cup games. Judas was also very raw.Erik, Mabbutt, Howells, Carr, Judas, Popescu, Dumitrescu, Sheringham, Barmby, Anderton, Klinsmann
Some posters on here tonight ought to be ashamed of themselves.
Nonsense. This is what really causes problems on a forum.
1. Ardiles football was great before key injuries set in, e.g. Teddy Sheringham and one of our defenders (i think Mabutt IIRC)
2. Once those injuries came Ardiles showed he couldn't adjust our tactics to being more pragmatic
3. We have just played a very average Chelsea side who have been on a loooong decline - check how many league games the've won in the last 18 months. We have given them that win on a plate due to naivety and some recklessness.
4. If we lose like this on the weekend away to Wolves will you be a similarly gushing?
Just understand that for the praise we can give for having a go, we can also critique what went wrong without having to be labelled as 'trolls' FFS!
Ardiles started 94/95 well but his decline had nothing to do with injuries. It was the personnel he chose at the back. Walker, Kerslake, Edinburgh, Judas and Calderwood in CM were ever presents and once teams figured us out, those 6 got exploited. Watch Nethercott against Southampton. Watch the 2-5 Emirates Marketing Project game. Nothing to do with injuries. Sheringham got injured the season before IIRC but played all games under Ossie in 94/95.
Erik, Mabbutt, Howells, Carr, Judas, Popescu, Dumitrescu, Sheringham, Barmby, Anderton, Klinsmann
Did Popescu play under Ossie. If he did, it was a game or two at most. Erik the Viking was finished by the time Klinsmann came in…Walker was the keeper. Carr didn’t play under Ossie or, if he did, it was friendlies and cup games. Judas was also very raw.
Compare results. Or shut up.
Not reallyThey are/were poor i agree. All the worse for how it reflects on us though....
But looked worseand it worked, they got the points
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.