Thomas Frank - Former Head Coach

[SissokoWasGood (BoL)]

The bottom line is the precious valuable intangibles only come from a select group of managers......and even then you have to rely on a bit of luck with timing.

Data is a great resource. But a resource that every club has these days.

And if you build the wrong model, or draw the wrong conclusions, or don’t have a sense of what you should be looking for, all the data in the world won’t help you.

 

[SissokoWasGood (BoL)]

Props to Ange for getting the team to retain faith in him....that's a tough gig when you're losing every week.

So although he ticked that box....it must have been the football/tactics that cooked him.

What’s odd is that he was gone in February. So just at the point that we’re coming out of the worst of the injury crisis, we’re securing the wins that virtually guarantee our safety, and make the decision to focus on the Europa, that’s when the decision is made.

So this is before even more of the losses come in. Which leads me to think at the time that the club again just drew the wrong conclusions. Words to the effect of ‘even with the injuries, the results haven’t been good enough and we need to compete on all fronts’. I just thought this was blather for the fans so they they could justify the sacking, I didn’t think they would actually be so oblivious to context that they truly believed it. Because the sacking decision was made way before the end of the season.

I genuinely just think it was injuries that cooked him, because the club made the decision to sack him right at the end of the worst of the injury run. and clearly they then decided, we need someone more pragmatic, we need someone that won’t play as intense a style because we can’t have all these injuries, we need more clean sheets.

 

[MartyFunkhouser]

If I wanted to be kind I would say that possibly he focused too much on the negatives of last season/our general position & weaknesses when taking over and set out with too much caution as a result. The goals against, the defeats, the high number of possession losses etc - he referenced the latter early on iirc, I wonder if that meant he treated us like his promoted Brentford team rather than his more recent Brentford team (or his promotion chasing Brentford team) perhaps he thought playing a more front foot game with our lack of solid/consistent on the ball midfielders meant we would continue to be punished on turnovers. I've often referred to Brentfords build up play stats from last season and how they differ from what we were seeing here - they did build up through the middle of the pitch much more than what we saw here - so that gave me reason to think we would eventually see some development towards that here

Yeh and lets be honest, we are a work in progress for any manager, rightly or wrongly it didn't work for him but this season has gone down the carbon copy route of last year, great in Europe, crap in the league, injury crisis and what looks like another 17th place finish. So although he might have been negative with his ideas and speeches, he isn't totally wrong about where we are as a club currently in some respects. I don't think we are 17th bad but its clear we can't operate on two levels, although the injuries have compounded it so has some terrible decisions at club level which has impacted.

Whoever takes over here has a massive job on their hands, we are in a post Kane & Son quandary IMO, the circus at board and exec level in no way helps, the Fab situation is just embarrassing

 

[Baleforce]

Have you got the data for Pochs lemons?

No, but it is measurable.

 

[ricky2tricky4city]

What’s odd is that he was gone in February. So just at the point that we’re coming out of the worst of the injury crisis, we’re securing the wins that virtually guarantee our safety, and make the decision to focus on the Europa, that’s when the decision is made.

So this is before even more of the losses come in. Which leads me to think at the time that the club again just drew the wrong conclusions. Words to the effect of ‘even with the injuries, the results haven’t been good enough and we need to compete on all fronts’. I just thought this was blather for the fans so they they could justify the sacking, I didn’t think they would actually be so oblivious to context that they truly believed it. Because the sacking decision was made way before the end of the season.

I genuinely just think it was injuries that cooked him, because the club made the decision to sack him right at the end of the worst of the injury run. and clearly they then decided, we need someone more pragmatic, we need someone that won’t play as intense a style because we can’t have all these injuries, we need more clean sheets.

I don't think it was odd he was gone in February. He was open to be questioned at that stage.
If it was the injuries that caused such unpalatable form (not saying it is or it isn't btw) then the same reasoning would have to be offered to Frank?

The top and bottom of it was Frank wasn't the answer to Ange....but Ange wasn't the answer to Ange either.

 

[Gazza]

I don't think it was odd he was gone in February. He was open to be questioned at that stage.
If it was the injuries that caused such unpalatable form (not saying it is or it isn't btw) then the same reasoning would have to be offered to Frank?

The top and bottom of it was Frank wasn't the answer to Ange....but Ange wasn't the answer to Ange either.

We could have given Ange, semenyo, Neto, Geuhi, and we still would have been a terrible version of Ossie Ardilles fab 5.

 

[SissokoWasGood (BoL)]

I don't think it was odd he was gone in February. He was open to be questioned at that stage.
If it was the injuries that caused such unpalatable form (not saying it is or it isn't btw) then the same reasoning would have to be offered to Frank?

The top and bottom of it was Frank wasn't the answer to Ange....but Ange wasn't the answer to Ange either.

If we go from the City 4-0 win to February, where we barely couldn’t even field a team of 11 players, and had to play actually unfit players, and decide that this means Ange had to go, I think that’s insanely bad decision making to be honest.

If the decision on Ange was that we need someone with longevity, someone who has proven they can stick at clubs over the course of multiple years, and maybe someone that isn’t so stuck on one system that they need their best players always to be fit for it to work consistently, I get that. But it wasn’t why they hired Frank. They genuinely believed that we needed a more defensive manager because we conceded too many goals. And it’s just devoid of context. As well as the fact that football doesn’t work like that. You need everyone to be bought in to the plan whether you’re attacking or defending, otherwise you’re losing games

I think Frank has had injuries, but it’s only in recent weeks has it reached a truly insane level. The slide started long before. Alarm bells should have been ringing after the Chelsea game. Because it wasn’t the injuries with Frank, it was that the players were not remotely behind his style of football, and that game made it abundantly clear.