One however was politically & religiously motivated, intended (as admitted by the perpetrator) to terrorise a population.
The other wasn't.
The comparison is absurd.
Who on here has justified it? You are aware of the meaning of this word I assume? That is a slur, if you are referring to posters on here. If you were referring to the wider community, then specify. And NO, I will NOT get over it!
Thought you wouldn't.
Look, the word justify may not convey what I was looking for when I posted that in the middle of a night shift last night.
However, there are those, who seem to solely want to put this down to the actions of someone mentally dsiturbed or on drugs.
Personally, I refuse to accept that.
I've been quite moderate in my posts in this thread so far, but to me and many others, this crime was carried out in the name of Islam, whether Islam backed it or not, and therefore those trying to blame it on drugs or mental condition are just wrong, and it smacks of a type of justification for the act.
what about the comparison that the media seem to be having a fantastic time referring to this a "terrorist attack" yet the same media outlets thought the best way to describe Anders breivik's attacks as that of a psychopath?
Okay, I will accept that, but I was incenced when I read the word "justify" because clearly nobody who has posted on this thread in any way endorses what these scumbags have done.
So.. no surprise then they had links to Anjem Choudary.
Thought you wouldn't.
Look, the word justify may not convey what I was looking for when I posted that in the middle of a night shift last night.
However, there are those, who seem to solely want to put this down to the actions of someone mentally dsiturbed or on drugs.
Personally, I refuse to accept that.
I've been quite moderate in my posts in this thread so far, but to me and many others, this crime was carried out in the name of Islam, whether Islam backed it or not, and therefore those trying to blame it on drugs or mental condition are just wrong, and it smacks of a type of justification for the act.
That would be far more appropriate than comparing this incident vs. Dale Cregan.
yep agree with that, too many people want to pussy foot around and refuse to even think that it was an Islamist led murder. Im afraid to say but there is too much lea way given to facilitate islam. To try and apply sharia law to non muslims in the uk then fudge right off
This is the last straw for me.
Muslims get out. No more business from me, nothing but hassle from me from now on.
Rape gangs, daylight murder. This isn't Karachi. It has to end.
I feel had it been a white person attacking a non-white, or even any person committing a homophobic crime, the uproar may well have been greater on here, and more of you would be saying hate crime rather than act of lunacy.
Two weeks ago an elderly pakistani man was killed in Birmingham in what was believed to be a racially motivated attack, but there was little media coverage or outrage on here.
Yes but let's not tar all with the same brush. The KKK never represented white Christians. Or as twitter put it: "Blaming all Muslims for what happened yesterday is like blaming all Jimmy's for what Saville did." And conversely terrorists/extremists are insane to think this eye for an eye thing works. The media, as always have an important role to play
Two weeks ago an elderly pakistani man was killed in Birmingham in what was believed to be a racially motivated attack, but there was little media coverage or outrage on here.
Point is we need to keep our heads' and see that these are the actions of insane people.
I know exactly why.
Seriously, murder somebody in the name of a said faith yet you believe nothing to do with it?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.