im not condoning anything at all that happened in that video and completely advocate the people involved experiencing the same treatment before being sent to prison
but did anyone really think it was all hunky dorry, cuddly cuddly in "slaughter houses"?
the bottom line is "the centre of humanity is cruelty", and will continue to be
you also cant expect people to work in a job where killing animals for profit is their business and expect them not to be mentally altered by it (you can hope for it - but to expect is naive)
im not vegitarian (although i am moving towards a minimal meat diet out of taste choice mostly (and morality slightly)) - but humanity consumes a lot of meat (and eggs, milk), too much for it be sustainable as well as ethical
sad, but true
monkey, there are no excuses for the behavior within a slaughterhouse. Are you suggesting that we are naive if we expect the livestock NOT to be tortured before we eat it? Yes, I know how messy meat production can be, but videos like the one in the article infuriate me every time I watch one.
My cousin in Greece is a farmer and regularly has to slaughter his livestock, but I wouldn't say he's mentally altered because of it. It's simply the lifestyle that he has grown up in. He doesn't beat or kick his livestock, let alone shock them incessantly.
As one of the Ugly Americans posting on this board, I know we have the same sorts of issues in our own slaughterhouses. However, like the animals that are slaughtered there, the American public is oblivious to most issues, especially those regarding their own health (nevermind the health of others, be they human or livestock). We eat a lot of meat in this country, but like everything else, prices must always be brought down.
I know I tend to generalize, but there is no excuse for mistreating animals. Factory farms are absolutely wretched places where pigs can live in a pen that's barely their own width and have no room to move. Chickens are also cooped up tightly in cages and never get let out.
Industrialization can work for cars, but it absolutely should not be applied to livestock, except in cases where the animals are unharmed (milking, egg extraction, etc.). What torrid places, and the workers tend to be mistreated as well (same goes for any big industry). When I buy meat (and I eat my fair share), I try not to buy from flimflam 'organic' or the cheap brands. I boycott Smithfield products because of their notoriously bad slaughterhouse practices. It also doesn't help that we as the consumers are so far removed from this whole process. The moral dilemma I am facing recently is whether I would be able to slaughter an animal I intended to eat, and if I couldn't, whether I should eat meat at all. But most people don't think about such things. All they care about is Kim fudging Kardashian and Tim (the twunt) Tebow. And of course, the big industrial farms always deny that their practices are wrong or unsafe, for both the livestock and the consumers. They can afford lobbyists to essentially write the laws for them and render the Food & Drug Administration toothless in its authority.
I agree with the last point you make, monkey. We do eat a lot of meat and would be better off if people asked "Where did this come from?" every time they went to the grocery store. But ultimately, money trumps all and we are hopeless for change.
oh Papa - you mentioned Smithfield in your post. is that a US brand or do you mean Smithfield market?
I try to justify my eating meat by telling myself that we as humans have been doing it for our entire existence. On top of that, this is how the food chain works, but even a lion will quickly finish off its prey so it does not need to suffer. The only point you made that I still disagree with is that the person abusing and torturing these animals was probably likely to commit that sort of behavior even prior to him working in that slaughterhouse. But if that behavior is ACCEPTED in the slaughterhouse, well, that's a whole other can of worms.these same people (and i am by no means excluding myself) will be horrified by these videos - then eat a sausage sandwich without even making the link.
Smithfield Foods is a US brand.
A lot of the animal abuse videos come from their subsidiary factory farms. Same with Spam, but that kind of goes without saying...
I try to justify my eating meat by telling myself that we as humans have been doing it for our entire existence. On top of that, this is how the food chain works, but even a lion will quickly finish off its prey so it does not need to suffer. The only point you made that I still disagree with is that the person abusing and torturing these animals was probably likely to commit that sort of behavior even prior to him working in that slaughterhouse. But if that behavior is ACCEPTED in the slaughterhouse, well, that's a whole other can of worms.
I know it's part of American literature/history courses, but have any of you read The Jungle by Upton Sinclair? One of the main topics the public took away from the book were the descriptions of the terrible conditions in slaughterhouses when industrialization was in full pitch. Originally, Sinclair wanted to show all the political corruption, but I guess those two things, and many more, are connected.
Additionally, our FDA has some remarkably lax regulations on how much dust/insect parts/rodent hairs are allowed in our food (natural contaminants).
im not vegitarian (although i am moving towards a minimal meat diet out of taste choice mostly (and morality slightly)) - but humanity consumes a lot of meat (and eggs, milk), too much for it be sustainable as well as ethical
Isn't there a school of thought that says world hunger could be eliminated if we stopped breeding meat for eating?
I think the general idea MB, is that pastoral farming produces much less foot by area used, especially when you factor in the amount of area needed just to grow feed.
Interesting that this thread should come up. I only heard the name Temple Grandin for the first time this weekend:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Grandin
Her story shows how/why people with neuro/spectral issues can be so important, as the neural pathway fixation they develop (IMO due to toxic pharmacology being administered at early ages, or pre-birth, in most cases, or issues such as a lack of alkaline minerals in the mother leading to pre-eclampsia etc) can be ideal for development of ideas, where an average mind will wander around ideas/topics, they often do not and can concentrate and focus far more of the minds capacity to solve issues.
Of course this takes good teaching and parenting (which must be so very difficult).
She is an inspiration for sure.