• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Sick sick world what is wrong with people

Sick stuff here from ICE murdering scumbags

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Why is everyone assuming this is murder?

She already tried to drive into one of their vehicles as it was moving at high speed. Then she accelerates with an agent in front of the car.

Quite interesting how all the leftists who are so desperate for it to be murder so they can go looting again won't show the rear angle where you see the agent being hit by her car.

Frankly they should have aimed at the screeching woman behind the camera and done us all a favour.
 
Why is everyone assuming this is murder?

She already tried to drive into one of their vehicles as it was moving at high speed. Then she accelerates with an agent in front of the car.

Quite interesting how all the leftists who are so desperate for it to be murder so they can go looting again won't show the rear angle where you see the agent being hit by her car.

Frankly they should have aimed at the screeching woman behind the camera and done us all a favour.
Post said video then?

It's interesting that the agents first thought is to shoot someone in the face rather than jump out of the way, interesting too that none of his colleagues thought he was in danger and pulled their guns to shoot her.

And if she has done all that you say she's meant to have done, it is frankly amazing that guns aren't drawn and they're demanding her to get out at gunpoint - it isn't like they need an excuse over there.
 
Why is everyone assuming this is murder?

She already tried to drive into one of their vehicles as it was moving at high speed. Then she accelerates with an agent in front of the car.

Quite interesting how all the leftists who are so desperate for it to be murder so they can go looting again won't show the rear angle where you see the agent being hit by her car.

Frankly they should have aimed at the screeching woman behind the camera and done us all a favour.
'JD has entered the chat'
 
Post said video then?

It's interesting that the agents first thought is to shoot someone in the face rather than jump out of the way, interesting too that none of his colleagues thought he was in danger and pulled their guns to shoot her.

And if she has done all that you say she's meant to have done, it is frankly amazing that guns aren't drawn and they're demanding her to get out at gunpoint - it isn't like they need an excuse over there.
Sorry, it's been over all the news channels, so I assumed everyone had seen it.

It's the second angle on this video https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/07/us/video/mn-minnesota-shooting-timeline-digvid

You may want to mute it to avoid whoever that it screeching from behind the camera.
 
Why is everyone assuming this is murder?

She already tried to drive into one of their vehicles as it was moving at high speed. Then she accelerates with an agent in front of the car.

Quite interesting how all the leftists who are so desperate for it to be murder so they can go looting again won't show the rear angle where you see the agent being hit by her car.

Frankly they should have aimed at the screeching woman behind the camera and done us all a favour.

Dude. This is a public forum. You really don't want to posting nonsense like this.
 
Sorry, it's been over all the news channels, so I assumed everyone had seen it.

It's the second angle on this video https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/07/us/video/mn-minnesota-shooting-timeline-digvid

You may want to mute it to avoid whoever that it screeching from behind the camera.
I'd seen that, thought you had something concrete.

When forward motion starts he draws right away, no attempt to move - even with those poor angles it seems fairly clear he could have dived/jumped to his right and gotten out of the way.

Yea, she likely should not have been obstructing the road but he should have not fired, no control at all. Basically from the looks he has panicked.
 
I'd seen that, thought you had something concrete.

When forward motion starts he draws right away, no attempt to move - even with those poor angles it seems fairly clear he could have dived/jumped to his right and gotten out of the way.

Yea, she likely should not have been obstructing the road but he should have not fired, no control at all. Basically from the looks he has panicked.
And she has caused him to panic by driving a car at him.

How much does a person have to desperately want ICE agents to be wrong to think it's ok to drive a 2 ton car at one if them?

I would expect to get shot if I drove a car at an armed officer. It wasn't all that long ago that a similar thing happened in the UK
 
And she has caused him to panic by driving a car at him.

How much does a person have to desperately want ICE agents to be wrong to think it's ok to drive a 2 ton car at one if them?

I would expect to get shot if I drove a car at an armed officer. It wasn't all that long ago that a similar thing happened in the UK

She doesn't drive at him and is not accelerating towards him. She is moving forward and right to drive away as they originally told her too before they decided to get her out of the car. People will see what they want to see from both sides of the argument here so I get that the car moves forward but is turning away from him before he fires

The fore-shortening in the other angle doesn't show contact or driving at him. It confirms she was turning right. You can't tell from it how close they are and his movement doesn't show that he is hit by the car or anything. The other video where he clearly is untouched has been even more widely shared, so I find it very hard to believe you hadn't seen it before commenting here but just chose to use the one being used by the White House etc .. In that he holsters his gun, takes 5 seconds to compose himself, and then walks down towards the crash and then is filmed walking back up to the ICE vehicles a little later. To suggest there was contact is just fantasy. If he had to go to hospital it was to be treated for shock that he had just shot someone.

Interesting another video which apparently shows ICE refusing to let a doctor who happened to be there approach the crashed car to even see if she had a pulse which is just a bizarre take on the humanity of some of these people.

In all likelihood the massive recruitment of 'enthusiastic' (!) law-abiding citizens (🤣) into ICE over the last 6 months has produced a semi-legal militia who are not properly trained to deal with these situations. There was no need to fire at her face. He was badly positioned and he probably shouldn't have had his weapon out as there was no evidence she was armed or dangerous and he could simply have been both better positioned and reacted normally by stepping aside for the '2 ton weapon aimed at him'.
 
And she has caused him to panic by driving a car at him.

How much does a person have to desperately want ICE agents to be wrong to think it's ok to drive a 2 ton car at one if them?

I would expect to get shot if I drove a car at an armed officer. It wasn't all that long ago that a similar thing happened in the UK
Was what I thought as well, we have all seen numerous attacks in recent years of people using vehicles as weapons.

As usual the far left can't see anything wrong with the threat of violence (driving a car at someone) if it's someone they like.
 
And to think right wing traitors want trump or temu Putin/trump (farage) to take over in the uk

Well we already got Started here who cancels elections, locks people up for social media posts(only when British though) campaigns for terrorists to come here, the Egyptian chap from last week who said all police should be shot and wanted genocide to white people.

So yeah we are doing great.
 
What do people see?
A banana?
An apple?
An apple behaving as a banana?
Or an apple disguised as a banana?

(n.b. this is a non-prejudicial question which is not designed to be sarcastic, cause frustration or anger in any way.
No opinions are 'lesser' than others.

p.s. if this is the wrong thread, mods, please move to the right one. Thank you.

20110721125011banana2.jpg.webp
 
And also ICE have no actual legal status against an US citizen except when it comes to immigration matters. They have no authority to deal with traffic violations or protests etc, so unless she was directly preventing them from making an arrest (not obvious in that video as a car drives past the front of her car so she isn't actually blocking traffic even) then in that situation they are just armed citizens trying to kidnap another citizen.
 
I see a berry.

And that is absolutely your right Sir. In fact, there is probably an argument to made that because a banana grows on a tree, and so do the likes of elderberries and mulberries, we should perhaps broaden our horizons and accept that it is perfectly feasible that a banana could, maybe even should, in fact be a berry.
 
Back