• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Sandro Tonali

‘made’ or turned over? I doubt we have cleared profits anywhere near that.

Turnover is revenue mate. Profit is something different. But as significant a factor. The club manipulates the books to generate a loss to avoid a heavy tax bill. Our financial position is just fine.
 
My guess is, Viv Lewis hating Levy and deciding she wants a legacy that isn't 'being Joe Lewis's kid'.

If she pulls off a Spurs revival, she'll be remembered as the owner that brought us what Joe couldn't. Guessing that might at least partly explain this largesse.
She helped write the Anfield Rap. What greater football legacy could there be?
 
The media coverage has been hilarious this summer (and before that tbh)

“Spurs don’t sign anyone, why? They aren’t good enough”

“Spurs have a tiny wage barrier that they they will never break, it’s why they never get anywhere”

“Big clubs decide what a player is worth and are willing to pay it to get the player, that’s why Spurs aren’t a big club”

“Spurs are now trying to sign players, but we think these players are better than playing for Spurs”

“Spurs look like they might get these players, the players must just be after the money”

“Spurs are paying them big wages, we now think that’s a bit reckless”

“Spurs have actually signed them now, the players must be bang average”

“Spurs paid a big fee, we now think they’ve overpaid”

Constant hypocrisy and changing the goalposts just so you can bash the club - pathetic.
 
Back