• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

An ordinary punter wouldn't be able to tell the tax authorities they didn't get it right because they didn't know the rules, so it should be no different for Mr Polanski (as he's calling himself these days).
Er....but that's what anyone would say if they didn't literally know the rules up until the moment they were told the rules.
Then you rectify the issue post being told the rules

The only other pathway (towpath?:)) is he knew the rules?
 
To be fair she didn't call him a child rapist.
She called him an enabler of child rapists.
They does seem too far - but it's clearly an issue; see Jess Phillips resignation letter

To be fair, with her grammar, it can be read as he is both a child rapist and also a paedophile enabler, rather than a child rapist enabler and a paedophile enabler.

First time I skimmed through it I didn't immediately link the enabler bit to both parts of the statement.
 
To be fair, with her grammar, it can be read as he is both a child rapist and also a paedophile enabler, rather than a child rapist enabler and a paedophile enabler.

First time I skimmed through it I didn't immediately link the enabler bit to both parts of the statement.

Yeh its a horrifically put together post.

She is a cnut though
 
Back