• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

OMT Spurs v Athletico

NaijaSpurs said:
He continues to play with a back 3 which in practice is a back 5. We are then left with just 2 in central midfield. Zero creativity plus ge though Kinsky was an upgrade, so yeah it is fecking worth sacking him.

And we looked better under Frank, so yeah, it is fecking well worth sacking him.
Click to expand...
Didn't you want Frank sacked though? Do we keep sacking until we find someone who has the magic juice?

We have zero creativity because we have none fit and available in the squad. A new manager can't fix that. I do agree with the 3 at the back (I'm never a fan of this) but I just think sacking another manager is just kind of missing the point.

We have a personnel problem. Until we admit that we will keep having problems.
 
Bishop said:
My personal stance is there isn't really a manager who could do what you're suggesting. The rot is deep, too deep for one man too fix and not quickly.

But in the topic of this match unless you're just being reactionary what is it about this specific match that means you think he should get the can?
Click to expand...

It's not just this match, is it?

Played 4, lost 4.

It hasn't had the desired effect.

Is there anyone else out there who might be able to scrape enough to see us safe?

Who knows. However, stick with Tudor and it's Lincoln away next season.
 
Legohamster said:
Was the same at points under Frank

The points we've thrown away due to players switching off would see us well clear of safety.
Click to expand...
This was the situation in many performances last season too. While on paper our squad is far better than our league position, our mental capacity appears to be League One standard at best.
 
NaijaSpurs said:
He continues to play with a back 3 which in practice is a back 5. We are then left with just 2 in central midfield. Zero creativity plus he thought Kinsky was an upgrade, so yeah it is fecking worth sacking him.

And we looked better under Frank, so yeah, it is fecking well worth sacking him.
Click to expand...
It's not a back five, it's a three. The two WBs are pushed up and allowing Athletico wingers to get in behind them.
 
GlennGoddle said:
It's not just this match, is it?

Played 4, lost 4.

It hasn't had the desired effect.

Is there anyone else out there who might be able to scrape enough to see us safe?

Who knows. However, stick with Tudor and it's Lincoln away next season.
Click to expand...
De Zebri is about the best shout from the names I've seen. He knows the league at least.
 
Just finished a Korfball training session and went to check the score.... Saw Kinsky made headlines.....

At least we can, erm, concentrate on the league now?!
 
GlennGoddle said:
It's not just this match, is it?

Played 4, lost 4.

It hasn't had the desired effect.

Is there anyone else out there who might be able to scrape enough to see us safe?

Who knows. However, stick with Tudor and it's Lincoln away next season.
Click to expand...

Totally the wrong appointment, everybody makes mistakes in like, and the board have made a massive one. Now they need to take proper ownership of their mistake, hold their hands up, admit they got it badly wrong and rectify it before it really is too late to make a difference.

We are not officially dead yet, and wont be after we get our usual loss at Anfield, but we will have a foot in the Championship if we lose to Forest, that game is worth hundreds of millions to this club, we simply have to win it, and believe we WON'T if Tudor is at the helm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back