The team had some top players [ i agree he helped improve them] but we should have won somthing with them. The likes of Erikson, Son, Kane etc etc and we did not do so. We had chances to do so but fell short and he has to take some of the weight for that. IMO
I think the context is really important. He had us as CL regulars while building a new stadium and not spending anywhere near as much as competitors. He was clearly told that consistent league finishes and CL money would be more valuable to the club so that is what he did. If he had the luxury of doing what Ange did, I’m sure he would have done it.
I think it’s interesting how much people discount the impact of the manager. In the same way we’re saying that Poch had this amazing squad, people have been saying this year the squad under Frank is bad and about deserves what it’s getting. Poch for sure improved players individually but built a culture that meant that they all improved together, and fought for each other. His unique advantage was in building a culture where all of the players ran harder, ran together, and played with the intensity to beat out richer teams. When those players got older, he wanted to refresh the squad to maintain that advantage and wasn’t allowed to do so. He was then blamed for the results sliding when he predicted that they would 2 years in advance.
Since then he has shown with PSG, Chelsea and the USMNT that he takes an initial few months to establish his principles and build that culture, but then it starts paying off.
I do agree that there is a question now as to whether his advantage around pressing has been nullified and whether we might be better served trying to get the ‘next’ Poch, one who is on the upswing and represents better where the league is going. With that said, I always found him quite adaptable. As Conte showed how 3-4-3 could work in England, Poch made it work with us. He also played more of a diamond with Chelsea and I think was always looking at where the game was going and how to adapt. He is pragmatic, but with a sense of still wanting to seize initiative of the match.
I think the main question I would be asking him in interview is how he feels about the games evolution in the last year in the PL, and how he would adapt his philosophy to succeed in this new environment. If he gives a great answer to that question, I’d hire him back like a shot.