Mykhailo Mudryk

[fernadez]

He's not Muani

 

[Baleforce]

He barely failed the test, and based on current testing procedures he would have passed. (which I think is why they ended his ban)

Prob taken less of anything than the entire Klopp Liverpool team.

Lance Armstrong was clean compared to that lot

 

[El Dante]

Not who I wanted us to sign but I’ve made that perfectly clear. Now he’s here, I hope he does well as that benefits us. I have my doubts but will support him long as he gives his all whilst with us.

 

[monkeybarry]

I'll judge him based on outcomes ahead of preconceptions.

 

[ricky2tricky4city]

I love a redemption arc, hopefully we get one. Welcome Mykhailo.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Love the 'talent ain't enough' tattoo... probably not the best words to have on display when you're up on a doping charge

 

[SteveAWOL]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[thfcsteff]

Love the 'talent ain't enough' tattoo... probably not the best words to have on display when you're up on a doping charge

hahahahaha, excellent form @ricky2tricky4city

 

[metalgear]

i liked the original mudryk but not sure if he's got it still after the lengthy ban

whatever the case i trust if anyone can, dezerbi has the best chance of restoring his talents and application - immediately he will be a useful direct and pacy outlet that will strike fear in any defence.

what i didn't like was the option of 75 mil purchase after the loan. it should be much lower since we take the time and risk to play him.

 

[Jurgen the German]

Little bit miffed by this one to say the least, maybe he will surprise us (in a good way).

 

[Sandman]

i liked the original mudryk but not sure if he's got it still after the lengthy ban

whatever the case i trust if anyone can, dezerbi has the best chance of restoring his talents and application - immediately he will be a useful direct and pacy outlet that will strike fear in any defence.

what i didn't like was the option of 75 mil purchase after the loan. it should be much lower since we take the time and risk to play him.

that is what I cant work out. Where does that number even come from for a player who has been banned and shown no form. Chelsea should be glad we even wanted to loan him.

 

[billyiddo]

I think the 75m buy clause really tips the balance of this deal to being a poor one. If he shows himself to be a good player we'll have to pay a premium to keep him - having been the ones who have done the work to get him firing - if we choose not to buy him in that instance we've essentially built up a Chelsea asset for them to either use or make a sizeable book profit on.

Whoever negotiated this one needs their position reviewed

 

[MartyFunkhouser]

I think the 75m buy clause really tips the balance of this deal to being a poor one. If he shows himself to be a good player we'll have to pay a premium to keep him - having been the ones who have done the work to get him firing - if we choose not to buy him in that instance we've essentially built up a Chelsea asset for them to either use or make a sizeable book profit on.

Whoever negotiated this one needs their position reviewed

Yeh, when framed like this, its a shoite deal

 

[Gutter Boy]

I think the 75m buy clause really tips the balance of this deal to being a poor one. If he shows himself to be a good player we'll have to pay a premium to keep him - having been the ones who have done the work to get him firing - if we choose not to buy him in that instance we've essentially built up a Chelsea asset for them to either use or make a sizeable book profit on.

Whoever negotiated this one needs their position reviewed

Or we could just make him be the keepers' training ball boy for a year, and return Chelsea their asset completely valueless.

 

[Daisuk]

If he’s a hit, we get him, if he’s brick, we send him back. I don’t see the issue. Clearly a very talented player. Blossomed under RDZ before, can do it again. Has extreme speed and is a very good dribbler.

I’m quite excited about him. Hope people in the stands support him.

 

[ShipOfTheseus]

If he’s a hit, we get him, if he’s brick, we send him back. I don’t see the issue. Clearly a very talented player. Blossomed under RDZ before, can do it again. Has extreme speed and is a very good dribbler.

I’m quite excited about him. Hope people in the stands support him.

It’s not going to be that binary, though, is it?

The question next year is more likely to be whether he is competent enough as a back-up to whoever the starting LW is by then.

 

[glorygloryeze]

Well, given those terms this is definitely not what Conte would call a 'club signing'...over to you Roberto

 

[glorygloryeze]

I wonder if he will bring the much needed pace we lack somewhat these days...

 

[El Dante]

I think he has the lowest settling in period of any signing that we have ever made. If he’s not immediately at it then many in the crowd will be immediately at him.

 

[Baleforce]

Had our pants pulled down on this one.

 

[ricky2tricky4city]

It’s not going to be that binary, though, is it?

The question next year is more likely to be whether he is competent enough as a back-up to whoever the starting LW is by then.

The £75m clause makes it binary though.

He's gonna need to look like Doue for us to pay that.