A true “automatic” release clause is drafted so that, subject to any qualifying conditions (window dates, a list of authorised clubs, relegation, etc.), the club must accept an offer that matches the stated figure. If it refuses, the matter can be forced through league arbitration and the club will lose
https://www.danielgeey.com/done-deal-blog/buy-out-release-clauses-in-football-the-basics
Bottom-line legal mechanics:
Trigger – Bid matches the sum and satisfies any formalities.
Automatic effect – Player gains the right to talk to the bidder and, if terms are agreed, to move. The selling club’s duty to issue a transfer agreement or release registration is enforceable by arbitration.
NDA fallout – Separate litigation or disciplinary action. Remedies = money, fines, reputational harm – not the power to keep the player.
Practical delay – A club can slow things down by lodging complaints, but if the clause is valid it cannot ultimately veto the transfer.
Summary:
- The release clause is a performance obligation; the confidentiality breach is a separate cause of action (damages, disciplinary). English arbitrators keep them distinct.
- Rule W.15 of the PL expressly says “it shall be no answer … that documents are confidential.”
- If Spurs re-deposit the £60 m and file for arbitration, the panel is almost certain to order Forest to release the registration, even while a tapping-up charge rumbles on in parallel.
- League fines Spurs (£300-400 k) and perhaps the agent...