• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Mohammed Kudus

harr1984 said:
Pointless getting into a debate with @Bishop on this one, he's not going to budge on Johnson :D

Actually think Kudus v Johnson is an interesting case. I have been critical of Kudus purely from an end product point of view. Johnson has the end product which is crucial and a very positive thing to have at 24 years of age but needs to improve in other areas.

The opposite is true of Kudus - he needs to improve his decision making at the final hurdle ie when to pass vs when to shoot, which will help his overall figures.

However history tells you that the end product does come as age improves if you have the ability and Kudus is still fairly young and certainly has ability. Johnson improving aspects of his game such as beating his man etc isn't so easy to do, whilst not impossible. All in all I'd say it's good to have both these different players as options and will be interesting to see how the next couple of years go for them as there is plenty of scope for them both to improve....
Click to expand...

@Bishop doesn’t think we should settle for players he deems not good enough and I agree
 
Baleforce said:
Football was brick back then though, it was normal for attacking players to completely disregard their defensive responsibilities.

It’s completely unacceptable and unprofessional now.
Click to expand...

Was there football back then? I thought it was invented by Sky and Premier League. Back then the players used their own judgement playing in a loose playing system on awful playing surfaces with a cannon ball, they were so naive they tried to win games by scoring goals and had little idea of the high level of systematic cheating we love today.
 
K.D.D.D.D.Soc said:
Was there football back then? I thought it was invented by Sky and Premier League. Back then the players used their own judgement playing in a loose playing system on awful playing surfaces with a cannon ball, they were so naive they tried to win games by scoring goals and had little idea of the high level of systematic cheating we love today.
Click to expand...

Like I said, brick.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back