southstand1882
Mitchell Thomas
Can we lift his ban now that we got Leeds in the cup?
Perhaps a temporary lift, and then if he's a good boy, he can stay for good
Perhaps a temporary lift, and then if he's a good boy, he can stay for good
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Leeds Spur
- Thread starter southstand1882
- Start date
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
How long was he banned for ???
Gordinho
Banned
That's pretty all encompassing then. He already has read only rights.
southstand1882
Mitchell Thomas
Permanent ban
southstand1882
Mitchell Thomas
Eh?
I only raised it because we drew Leeds
I only raised it because we drew Leeds
WestBerkshire
Noé Pamarot
Why did he get banned?
Jurgen the German
Tommy Harmer
That rules out any football related discussion then
raboner
Banned
oohhhh snap.
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
No way, wowzers !!!
Crawley
Board Legend
Ok, as you all asked.......
Leeds is, indeed, perma-banned. And following discussion, it is agreed there will be no going back on this decision.
Leeds, like a few others on here, received numerous warnings, infractions, bans, call them what you want, on both this and previous incarnations of Glory-Glory.
In addition to this, what you guys don't see is the numerous PM exchanges that take place between the poster and the admin team, whereby we give additional un-documented warnings about how their behaviour is STILL causing concern, and how that behaviour is dragging them closer to further punishment.
Indeed, it could be said the admin team don't actually stick directly to our own rules, because we are normally FAR more lenient on these matters than adopting the exact procedures listed in "Forum Rules". But that is to all your benefit, not ours.
We make it a matter of practice NOT to discuss openly the reasons for a posters banning, suffice to say Leeds ban was due to an acumulation of offences, coupled with repeated warnings.
This was not a witch-hunt. We tried, as a group, to continually ask him to tone down his postings (especially those aimed directly at others) but to no avail. Even to the bitter end, one of the mods stuck up for him almost un-conditionally, but even they understood why we eventually had to act.
On a personal note, I was one of the few from this board to meet him in person, and found him to be calm, polite and a thoroughly pleasant person. And that itself pains me because he presented a totally different character once behind a keyboard.
It's a shame, because he was articulate, intelligent, and able to string a sentence together, even if you didn't agree with his standpoints, you can not deny this.
I'm glad to say his reaction to being banned (or the reasons) were never on the scale of previous bannees, such as Manc, who became vitriolic and made disgusting personal attacks on at least one member of the admin team.
And, because i know someone will ask, Mick Cooper is NOT perma-banned. He served a temp ban and is free to post, but has chosen to move onto pastures new, a decision we respect.
Leeds is, indeed, perma-banned. And following discussion, it is agreed there will be no going back on this decision.
Leeds, like a few others on here, received numerous warnings, infractions, bans, call them what you want, on both this and previous incarnations of Glory-Glory.
In addition to this, what you guys don't see is the numerous PM exchanges that take place between the poster and the admin team, whereby we give additional un-documented warnings about how their behaviour is STILL causing concern, and how that behaviour is dragging them closer to further punishment.
Indeed, it could be said the admin team don't actually stick directly to our own rules, because we are normally FAR more lenient on these matters than adopting the exact procedures listed in "Forum Rules". But that is to all your benefit, not ours.
We make it a matter of practice NOT to discuss openly the reasons for a posters banning, suffice to say Leeds ban was due to an acumulation of offences, coupled with repeated warnings.
This was not a witch-hunt. We tried, as a group, to continually ask him to tone down his postings (especially those aimed directly at others) but to no avail. Even to the bitter end, one of the mods stuck up for him almost un-conditionally, but even they understood why we eventually had to act.
On a personal note, I was one of the few from this board to meet him in person, and found him to be calm, polite and a thoroughly pleasant person. And that itself pains me because he presented a totally different character once behind a keyboard.
It's a shame, because he was articulate, intelligent, and able to string a sentence together, even if you didn't agree with his standpoints, you can not deny this.
I'm glad to say his reaction to being banned (or the reasons) were never on the scale of previous bannees, such as Manc, who became vitriolic and made disgusting personal attacks on at least one member of the admin team.
And, because i know someone will ask, Mick Cooper is NOT perma-banned. He served a temp ban and is free to post, but has chosen to move onto pastures new, a decision we respect.
southstand1882
Mitchell Thomas
So its that a yes, or no?
No, that's Jon
Gordinho
Banned
Aka The Spunky Monkey.
GlennGoddle
Andy Sinton
Billy is another who spends an obscene amount on MFC. Usually all on an obese Scottish woman.
Shame about Leeds.
Shame about Leeds.
:lol: fudge sakes that one night is going to stick to me forever isn't it?
re Leeds : shame he got banned as he provided a fair bit of entertainment and never minced his words - but i do wonder sometimes how fully grown men can get themselves in to so much bother on the internet/forums etc just wind your neck in and avoid the people that tinkle you off, simple really