Out of interest, say we dont have the cash to propel us to a top four position and that we have actually reached our potential (until a new stadium is built) - is there any reason to keep him? By that I mean is there any reason to keep a 60-80m asset when you cant even afford to fulfil any potential that there may be? By selling Bale some may argue that it will help us to fulfil and exceed our potential.
I love Bale and want him to stay etc but a) the guy does deserve CL football and b) He may have played his best football for us given the calibre of players he is playing with and the only way he will get better with us is with better forward players.
You talk about getting these players like we could pluck them from a tree, he'll we haven't managed to even persuade leandro to sign or his club to sell after about three fecking seasons of trying! (and he isn't exactly a top striker, though he potentially could be) It isn't that simple, yes well have money but could we get the top quality players needed to make up for the loss of bale? Its no certainty that we could.
One issue for him might be that he has blossomed into this phenomenon who has managed to carry us for most of a season, without actually having a very well-defined team role. He's been the guy we give the ball to and then stand back and watch while he does something wow. He might have some readjustment to do in a side that doesn't boast Parker, Defoe or bad Adebayor.
If we can't get Bale to sign an extension, then I think 75m+ is a very decent sum given the amount it would depreciate next summer even if Bale improves.
BUT how good it is really depends on whether we could simultaneously sign the ideal replacements without their wages and transfer fees rising as soon as clubs realize we have money. Like I've said before, imo a trio of Lamela (RWF, stylistically similar to Bale but younger and cheaper at ~25m+, and if we got Baldini I think he would become gettable), Bernard (LAM, ~20m), and one of Draxler or Dzagoev (CAM, ~25m+) would improve us SUBSTANTIALLY in terms of creativity for roughly that sum in transfer fees. I think we might even be able to challenge if we got in a good forward and maybe a LB with the extra TV money. To make up for the wages, we can try to sell or release our older or more senior players (Gallas, Friedal, Defoe, Parker, Dawson, Benny, Huddlestone etc) who must be taking in relatively high amounts due to their seniority at Spurs.
However, the problem is that this is all easier said than done, to put it mildly. We/Levy struggle to finish even one deal within the transfer window half the time if we can't trigger their contracts (usually it's at least two windows, for Leandro you can add another dozen to that), so how are we going to get a hot prospect like Lamela within the tiny window of time that the end of Bale's saga would leave us? Much less THREE big players? Remember how Berbatov left us with freaking Frazier Campbell??? :lol:
If I were Levy, I'd be preparing behind the scenes for Bale's departure for the sole reason that we're not left hanging in the air with a big chunk of money and the smell of desperation. We have to lay the groundwork for the players we want; if they're not gettable, Bale can't be sold at any cost since that money will just evaporate anyways.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/teams/tottenham-hotspur
Well thats a done deal then. If Bale cant come out and commit to Spurs then just f*ck off
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/teams/tottenham-hotspur
Well thats a done deal then. If Bale cant come out and commit to Spurs then just f*ck off
I would rip there arm off for 100m
100m would be difficult to turn down even by anyones viewpoint.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.