It is an interesting discussion because there are two truths. Yes, we get deals done, but when it comes to potentially transformative players - or instant ‘difference makers’ - we rarely get the deals across the line. I think it’s fair to say that Eze is a difference maker when put against Biss.
Whenever we dangle a leg for a ‘big big’ signing, it is rare we get it across the line. We have, as many have said, made some excellent signings, but I’m thinking of this specific area. The Brunos, the Dybalas, the Diaz’s, the Ezes even. I understand that there are many nuances, but there also appears to be denominator, that we will only ever go ‘so far’ - and that if we do achieve an ‘accord’ we will then try to squeeze a little more. With Eze, I am still baffled that we didn’t either get the deal done earlier or not go there after all. We ended up at the same figure as the release clause; if we were seriously interested, why did we not just put that money down in the first place? Then if the goons had come in it would’ve forced an answer. Instead, it looks to me like we left the door ajar. FWIW I don’t believe that Eze ‘called Arteta Wed AM and asked if he wanted him’. More like they’ll have talked before and the agents involved would’ve dealt with Palace and the goons. I am guessing more like the goons get wind of this injury, ask Palace if the ink is dry, Palace say the pen hasn’t come out yet, goons say ‘can you wait an hour’ and there it is…anyway, long-winded there but it is an interesting discussion. There are no absolutes I agree, not with transfers, not with Daniel either, good and bad in all areas…like life!
