Antonio Nusa

[Bishop]

Odobert, Moore and possibly Solomon. Not really sure if the 3rd option. Son should be a rotational striker and Tel hasn't impressed enough in the role for us to buy imo.

 

[Bedfordspurs]

Interesting question: in an ideal world if you had to keep 3 of those for the LW position, who would they be?

Moore, Tel, Odobert and not in that order of course

 

[monkeybarry]

Interesting question: in an ideal world if you had to keep 3 of those for the LW position, who would they be?

Odobert. That's it.
Tel doesn't justify the £.
Moore needs a couple of years on loan.
The rest are not the future.

 

[Gutter Boy]

Interesting question: in an ideal world if you had to keep 3 of those for the LW position, who would they be?

For me Richy, Odobert and Moore.

Richy is the highest performing in that role at the moment, whereas Odobert and Moore are the future.

Son is spent, Gil and Soloman are never weres, and i prefer Odobert's creativity to Tel's directness

 

[Danishfurniturelover]

For me Richy, Odobert and Moore.

Richy is the highest performing in that role at the moment, whereas Odobert and Moore are the future.

Son is spent, Gil and Soloman are never weres, and i prefer Odobert's creativity to Tel's directness

Richy has not got 90 minutes in him and needs 6 weeks off after a 40 minute jog around.

Really good player for those 40 minutes.

 

[Bishop]

Richy has not got 90 minutes in him and needs 6 weeks off after a 40 minute jog around.

Really good player for those 40 minutes.

He's not even a good player for those 40 minutes, unless your definition of good is someone who runs around a bit but of whom the ball constantly bounces off his foot like he's playing squash.

I get it we have really low standards at Spurs and love a cult hero but this guy is not a good player and again a really simple test. If we put him up for sale tomorrow is anyone in the top 8 buying him? Hell no!

 

[Danishfurniturelover]

He's not even a good player for those 40 minutes, unless your definition of good is someone who runs around a bit but of whom the ball constantly bounces off his foot like he's playing squash.

I get it we have really low standards at Spurs and love a cult hero but this guy is not a good player and again a really simple test. If we put him up for sale tomorrow is anyone in the top 8 buying him? Hell no!

You know I actually agree with you.

Have always likened him to Chris Wood, well for 40 minutes every few months.

 

[Welshspur60]

He's not even a good player for those 40 minutes, unless your definition of good is someone who runs around a bit but of whom the ball constantly bounces off his foot like he's playing squash.

I get it we have really low standards at Spurs and love a cult hero but this guy is not a good player and again a really simple test. If we put him up for sale tomorrow is anyone in the top 8 buying him? Hell no!

He spends a lot of time on the floor thats for sure